Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Heuristics for scientific experimentation: a developmental study

D Klahr1, A L Fay, K Dunbar

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Cognitive Psychology
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells.

FEBS letters·2005
Same author

Detection of mycobacterial DNA from sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis.

Irish journal of medical science·2004
Same author

Cytokine concentrations and neutrophil elastase activity in bronchoalveolar lavage and induced sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis, mild asthma and healthy volunteers.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2004
Same author

Low incidence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroups B and C in lower respiratory tract secretions in patients with cystic fibrosis.

British journal of biomedical science·2004
Same author

A comparison of pulmonary exacerbations with single and multiple organisms in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Burkholderia cepacia infection.

The Journal of infection·2002
Same author

The effects of frontal lobe lesions on goal achievement in the water jug task.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2002
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Adults utilize advanced reasoning skills to navigate scientific discovery, unlike children who favor plausible hypotheses. This study reveals developmental differences in hypothesis testing and experimental design strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Science Education

Background:

  • Scientific discovery relies on exploring hypotheses and designing experiments.
  • Understanding developmental differences in scientific reasoning is crucial for education.
  • Previous research has not fully explored how children and adults coordinate hypothesis and experiment spaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate developmental differences in the search heuristics used in scientific reasoning.
  • To compare how children and adults manage hypothesis spaces and experiment spaces during scientific discovery.
  • To identify the cognitive skills underlying effective scientific reasoning across age groups.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-four subjects (3rd graders, 6th graders, community college students, and technically trained college students) were taught to use a programmable robot.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects were presented with a new, unknown operation and an incorrect hypothesis, then tasked with conducting experiments to discover the operation's true rule.
  • The plausibility of the initial hypothesis and its dissimilarity to the true rule were manipulated.

    • Main Results:

    • Children predominantly focused on plausible hypotheses and conducted limited, less informative experiments.
    • Adults demonstrated superior ability in discovering implausible (but correct) rules compared to children.
    • Performance deficits in children were not attributed to encoding or memory limitations, but to less effective coordination of hypothesis and experiment spaces.

    Conclusions:

    • Adults employ domain-general reasoning skills that extend beyond simple confirmation/disconfirmation logic.
    • Effective scientific reasoning involves coordinating search across both hypothesis and experimental spaces.
    • Developmental differences in scientific reasoning highlight the importance of teaching effective experimental design and hypothesis evaluation strategies.