Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence interval construction for effect measures arising from cluster randomization trials

A Donner1, N Klar

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|February 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-Diffusion in Amorphous Silicon by Local Bond Rearrangements.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Bortezomib, C1-inhibitor and plasma exchange do not prolong the survival of multi-transgenic GalT-KO pig kidney xenografts in baboons.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same author

Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

An evaluation of utility measurement in Crohn's disease.

Inflammatory bowel diseases·2013
Same author

[Endoscopic calcaneoplasty (ECP) in Haglund's syndrome. Indication, surgical technique, surgical findings and results].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie·2011
Same author

Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2011
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

What's the Meta Now? More Updates on the Problems with Systematic Reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

This study provides methods for constructing confidence intervals for treatment effects in cluster randomized trials. It covers continuous and dichotomous outcomes across three common designs.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly used in health research.
  • Accurate estimation of treatment effects and their uncertainty is crucial in CRTs.
  • Existing methods for confidence interval construction in CRTs require careful consideration of design features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present methods for constructing confidence intervals for summary measures of treatment effect.
  • To address designs that randomize participants to one of two treatment groups in clusters.
  • To provide guidance applicable to both continuous and dichotomous outcome variables.

Main Methods:

  • The study focuses on confidence interval construction for treatment effect summary measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It considers three fundamental cluster randomization designs: completely randomized, pair-matched, and stratified.
  • Methods are detailed for both continuous and dichotomous outcome data.

    • Main Results:

    • Provides a framework for calculating confidence intervals tailored to specific cluster randomization designs.
    • Demonstrates the application of these methods to common statistical models used in CRTs.
    • Highlights the importance of accounting for clustering when assessing treatment effect precision.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed methods offer a robust approach to confidence interval construction in CRTs.
    • Accurate confidence intervals are essential for valid interpretation of treatment effects in clustered data.
    • These methods support more reliable evidence synthesis from cluster randomized studies.