Related Experiment Videos
The superior pericardial sinus: normal appearance on gradient-echo MR images
C M Black1, L K Hedges, M C Javitt
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|April 1, 1993
Summary
The superior pericardial sinus can mimic flowing blood on gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) MRI. Understanding its appearance on GRE images is crucial to avoid misdiagnosing aortic dissection or vascular structures.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- The superior pericardial sinus, an extension of the superior pericardial recess, can present diagnostic challenges on MRI.
- Gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) sequences may produce signals from this sinus that resemble flowing blood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize and explain the typical appearance of the superior pericardial sinus on gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences.
- To differentiate the sinus's signal from actual vascular structures or aortic dissection.
Main Methods:
- MRI of the mediastinum was performed in six patients, with CT in two.
- T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo, ECG-gated images were acquired.
- Gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (GRASS) sequences with varying flip angles were used to image the superior pericardial sinus.
Main Results:
- The superior pericardial sinus was well-visualized, showing low signal on T1-weighted and high signal on T2-weighted images.
- On GRE and cine images with low flip angles (<20 degrees), the sinus signal mimicked flowing blood.
- This high signal was attributed to high proton density and long T2* of pericardial fluid, not flow.
Conclusions:
- The superior pericardial sinus exhibits a high signal on flow-sensitive GRE MRI with low flip angles, resembling flowing blood.
- This appearance is due to intrinsic fluid properties, not actual flow.
- Awareness of this GRE MRI artifact is essential for accurate diagnosis and avoiding misinterpretation as aortic dissection or vascular anomalies.