Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aortic arch versus central venous epinephrine during CPR

J E Manning1, C A Murphy, D N Batson

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Chapel Hill School of Medicine, University of North Carolina.

Annals of Emergency Medicine
|April 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Delivering epinephrine via aortic arch catheter during cardiac arrest significantly improves coronary perfusion pressure and speeds return of spontaneous circulation compared to central venous delivery. This method offers a more rapid and effective response for resuscitation efforts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Born into homelessness: A retrospective observational study.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Factors Affecting Exclusive Breastfeeding at a Tertiary Maternity Hospital.

Irish medical journal·2022
Same author

Establishing premises for inter-professional collaborative practice in school: inclusion, difference and influence.

Disability and rehabilitation·2020
Same author

Comparing the Standard and Electronic Versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale: A Validation Study.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2019
Same author

Precipitation and temperature drive continental-scale patterns in stream invertebrate production.

Science advances·2019
Same author

Engaging multiple stakeholders to improve speech and language therapy services in schools: an appreciative inquiry-based study.

BMC health services research·2019

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Cardiac arrest resuscitation often involves epinephrine administration.
  • The route of epinephrine delivery can impact its effectiveness.
  • Optimizing drug delivery is crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of aortic arch epinephrine delivery versus central venous epinephrine administration.
  • To evaluate the impact of epinephrine route on hemodynamic parameters during resuscitation.
  • To determine if peripheral arterial epinephrine delivery enhances cardiac resuscitation outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, nonblinded, controlled trial was conducted.
  • Sixteen mongrel canines were used as participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Epinephrine was administered via superior vena cava or aortic arch catheter during CPR, with hemodynamic monitoring.

    • Main Results:

    • Aortic arch epinephrine administration led to more rapid and greater increases in aortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure.
    • Return of spontaneous circulation was significantly faster in the aortic arch epinephrine group.
    • Maximal coronary perfusion pressure correlated strongly with pre-administration pressure in the aortic arch group.

    Conclusions:

    • Aortic arch epinephrine delivery provides a faster and more potent effect than central venous administration.
    • This route may be beneficial when standard resuscitation measures are insufficient.
    • Aortic pressure monitoring combined with aortic arch epinephrine may enhance resuscitation success.