Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to evaluate study methodology in published clinical research

G J Stoddard, W H Ring

    Journal of Intravenous Nursing : the Official Publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society
    |March 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evaluation of Skindex-16 construct validity in routinely collected psoriasis data: a retrospective analysis of the relationship between overall physician global assessment scores and Skindex-16 and measure discordance.

    Archives of dermatological research·2022
    Same author

    Vessel Wall Enhancement on Black-Blood MRI Predicts Acute and Future Stroke in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
    Same author

    Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
    Same author

    Vitamin D and Vulnerable Carotid Plaque.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
    Same author

    Prediction of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Using Adventitial Calcification and Plaque Thickness on CTA.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
    Same author

    Optimal Prediction of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Using Clinical and Lumen Imaging Markers.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2015
    Same journal

    The role of the perfusionist.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    Same journal

    Silicone catheter fracture secondary to stress events and a dressing technique to reduce those events.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    Same journal

    Fluid resuscitation in acutely injured patients.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    Same journal

    A story on childhood immunization practices, complete with camera footage of a nurse administering "a shot" to a child without using personal protective equipment.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    Same journal

    Clinical application of the World Health Organization analgesic ladder.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    Same journal

    Laboratory sampling. Alternate site perspectives.

    Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
    See all related articles

    Clinicians must assess the validity of clinical research findings before patient application. This article details key validity markers like authorship, bias, and statistical methods to ensure reliable study quality.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Evidence-Based Practice

    Background:

    • Assessing the validity of clinical research is crucial for informed patient care.
    • The clinical literature exhibits significant variability in study quality and reliability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To equip clinicians with markers for evaluating the quality of clinical research.
    • To enhance the critical appraisal skills of healthcare professionals.

    Main Methods:

    • The article outlines essential validity markers for assessing research quality.
    • Key indicators discussed include authorship, bias, confounding, statistical rigor, randomization, controls, and blinding.

    Main Results:

    • A comprehensive list of validity markers is presented to guide research evaluation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Understanding these markers aids in discerning credible study findings.

    • Conclusions:

    • Clinicians can improve patient care by critically evaluating research validity using presented markers.
    • Consistent application of these quality indicators ensures the reliable use of clinical evidence.