Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia in The Netherlands. General practice facts

C van Weel1

  • 1Department of General Practice and Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Australian Family Physician
|April 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of medical students' integrated clinical communication skills: development of a tailor-made assessment tool.

BMC medical education·2019
Same author

Students' experiences with a longitudinal skills training program on breaking bad news: A follow-up study.

Patient education and counseling·2018
Same author

Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.

Research involvement and engagement·2017
Same author

Implementing guidelines and training initiatives to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care consultations: a qualitative participatory European study.

International journal for equity in health·2017
Same author

Training general practitioners in early identification and anticipatory palliative care planning: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC family practice·2015
Same author

Routine control of oral contraceptive users: a new 'standard' in The Netherlands.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same journal

Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

Australian family physician·2018
See all related articles

A survey revealed general practitioners sometimes neglect euthanasia procedural requirements, like death certificates. Proper oversight is crucial for maintaining euthanasia standards and alleviating public fear stemming from misunderstandings.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Procedural requirements in euthanasia are critical for maintaining standards.
  • Public perception of euthanasia can be influenced by historical events and anecdotal evidence, leading to anxiety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess adherence to procedural requirements by general practitioners during euthanasia.
  • To identify specific areas where procedural compliance is lacking, such as death certificate issuance.
  • To explore the relationship between procedural oversight, euthanasia standards, and public perception.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of general practitioners regarding their practices in euthanasia.
  • Analysis of procedural compliance, focusing on death certificate documentation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant number of general practitioners did not consistently observe all procedural requirements for euthanasia.
  • Non-compliance was particularly noted in the correct issuing of death certificates.
  • The study highlights a gap between recommended procedures and actual practice.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to procedural requirements in euthanasia must be strengthened.
  • Prudent surveillance of euthanasia practices is essential to ensure high standards of care.
  • Clearer guidelines and consistent oversight can help mitigate public anxiety and misconceptions surrounding euthanasia.