Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of a computerised polysomnography system

H Biernacka1, N J Douglas

  • 1Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Edinburgh, City Hospital.

Thorax
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

A new computerised sleep analysis system (CNS Sleep Lab) shows accuracy comparable to manual scoring for sleep studies. However, it is more expensive and does not reduce analysis time for diagnosing sleep abnormalities.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytokine gene polymorphisms in obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Sleep medicine·2015
Same author

Narcolepsy and sleep-disordered breathing.

European journal of neurology·2011
Same author

Diagnosing narcolepsy with cataplexy on history alone: challenging the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) criteria.

European journal of neurology·2011
Same author

Continuous positive airway pressure improves vascular function in obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Thorax·2008
Same author

Sleep-disordered breathing after stroke: a randomised controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2006
Same author

Sleep-disordered breathing and upper airway size in pregnancy and post-partum.

The European respiratory journal·2006

Area of Science:

  • Medical Technology
  • Sleep Medicine
  • Diagnostic Tools

Background:

  • Manual analysis of sleep, breathing, and oxygenation records is the established standard for diagnosing sleep disorders.
  • Manual analysis is time-consuming and labor-intensive, necessitating investigation into automated alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy, time efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of a computerized sleep analysis system (CNS Sleep Lab) compared to manual scoring.
  • To determine if the CNS Sleep Lab system is a viable alternative for clinical sleep studies.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective comparison of manual and CNS Sleep Lab scoring for 43 consecutive clinical sleep studies.
  • Recording and analysis of accuracy, time taken, and costs for both methods.

Main Results:

  • Good correlation and no systematic differences between manual and computer scoring for total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and REM sleep duration.
  • Clinically insignificant differences in breathing pattern analysis (hypopneas/apneas) between the two methods.
  • Analysis time was similar for both manual and computerised methods (approximately 83-86 minutes).

Conclusions:

  • The CNS Sleep Lab system demonstrates sufficient accuracy for clinical sleep studies.
  • The computerized system is significantly more expensive than manual analysis and does not offer time savings for technicians.

Related Experiment Videos