Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictors of antidepressant response

F K Goodwin1

  • 1National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD 20857.

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Predicting antidepressant response remains a challenge. This review explores clinical, biological, and pharmacological factors, alongside non-pharmacological treatments like sleep and light therapy, to improve treatment selection for major depressive disorders.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to: Antidepressants worsen rapid-cycling course in bipolar disorder: A STEP-BD randomized clinical trial. J. Affect. Disord. (Jun. 10, 2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.054.

Journal of affective disorders·2017
Same author

Prospects for a scientific psychiatry.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

Bipolar disorder.

Dialogues in clinical neuroscience·2011
Same author

The bipolar spectrum and the antidepressant view of the world.

Journal of psychiatric practice·2005
Same author

What is to be done? Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of manic-depressive illness.

The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry·2003
Same author

Topiramate treatment of bipolar spectrum disorders: a retrospective chart review.

Annals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists·2002

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry and Neurobiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Major depressive disorder treatments have advanced with new pharmacological agents.
  • Predicting individual patient response to specific antidepressants is not fully understood.
  • Identifying reliable predictors is crucial for personalized depression treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of current knowledge on antidepressant response prediction.
  • To examine clinical, biological, and pharmacological variables influencing treatment outcomes.
  • To discuss the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for depression.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review synthesizing current research on antidepressant response predictors.
  • Analysis of variance sources: clinical, biological, and pharmacological.
  • Inclusion of evidence for non-pharmacological therapies (sleep deprivation, light therapy).

Main Results:

  • Antidepressant response prediction is complex, influenced by multiple factors.
  • Clinical variables (e.g., symptom profiles) and biological markers show potential predictive value.
  • Pharmacological response characteristics are key but require further elucidation.
  • Non-pharmacological treatments like sleep deprivation and light therapy demonstrate effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate prediction of antidepressant response requires integrating clinical, biological, and pharmacological data.
  • Further research is needed to establish robust predictive models for major depressive disorders.
  • Non-pharmacological therapies offer valuable alternatives or adjuncts in depression management.

Related Experiment Videos