Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effects of learning contexts on implicit and explicit learning

Y S Lee1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Memory & Cognition
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in natural killer cell activity and prostaglandin E2 levels during the progression of diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in Fischer 344 rats.

Oncology reports·1998
Same author

Time course of cell cycle-related protein expression in diethylnitrosamine-initiated rat liver.

Journal of hepatology·1998
Same author

A new preoperative immunochemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Hepato-gastroenterology·1998
Same author

Superiority of hepatic arterial infusion in preventing catabolism of 5-FU compared with portal vein infusion revealed by an in vivo 19F NMR study.

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology·1998
Same author

Two-step autocatalytic processing of the glutaryl 7-aminocephalosporanic acid acylase from Pseudomonas sp. strain GK16.

Journal of bacteriology·1998
Same author

Gender differences in baseline variables, therapies and outcomes in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction.

International journal of cardiology·1998
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals distinct learning systems for simple and complex rule-learning tasks. Explicit strategies aid simple rule acquisition but hinder complex rule learning, suggesting separate cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Implicit and explicit learning are fundamental cognitive processes.
  • Understanding the distinct mechanisms underlying different types of rule learning is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored rule learning but often without differentiating task complexity and learning contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of implicit and explicit learning in simple versus complex rule-learning tasks.
  • To examine how different learning contexts (e.g., verbalization, observational learning) interact with task complexity.
  • To determine if simple and complex rule learning rely on separate cognitive systems.

Main Methods:

  • Two parallel rule-learning tasks (simple and complex) were designed, varying input-output relationships and target value presentation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implicit and explicit learning were assessed using behavioral measures.
  • Experiments manipulated learning contexts, including verbalization, explicit instructions, and observational learning conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Verbalization and rule-search instructions facilitated simple task learning but impaired or had no effect on complex task learning.
    • Observational learning led to no learning in the simple task and impaired learning in the complex task.
    • Performance differences across conditions suggest distinct learning systems are engaged by the simple and complex tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings strongly suggest that simple and complex rule-learning tasks engage separate cognitive learning systems.
    • Explicit strategies are beneficial for simple rule acquisition but detrimental for complex rule acquisition.
    • The interaction between learning contexts and task complexity provides further evidence for distinct neural and cognitive underpinnings of these learning processes.