Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is writing as difficult as it seems?

C M Levy1, S Ransdell

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-2250, USA.

Memory & Cognition
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived stimulus complexity and food preference development.

Acta psychologica·2006
Same author

Outcome and long-term results following total hip replacement in elderly patients.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·1995
Same author

Kallmann syndrome in two sisters with other developmental anomalies also affecting their father.

Clinical genetics·1993
Same author

Ornithine decarboxylase activity, prolactin blood levels, and estradiol and progesterone receptors in human breast cancer.

Cancer·1987
Same author

An ERP analysis of repetition priming in bilinguals.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement·1987
Same author

Effects of spaced and repeated total sleep deprivation.

Ergonomics·1984
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Writers spend more time planning and generating text than revising, though revision time increases later in sessions. Their self-assessments of writing effort are inaccurate, suggesting a need for a time-and-effort-based writing analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Writing Studies

Background:

  • Understanding the temporal dynamics of writing subprocesses is crucial for effective writing instruction.
  • Previous research has often relied on self-reports, which may not accurately reflect actual time and effort allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the time and effort allocated to distinct writing subprocesses (planning, text generation, revising/reviewing).
  • To examine individual differences in writing styles based on subprocess transitions.
  • To investigate the accuracy of writers' self-perceptions of time and effort in writing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Measured time allocation to writing subprocesses over 10 weekly sessions using written and verbal protocols.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed writers' estimations of time and effort for writing subprocesses before and after 10 weeks of practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Planning time stabilized around 30%, text generation peaked at 50% midway, and revising/reviewing increased late in sessions.
  • Document quality correlated with revision time and reaction times in a secondary task.
  • Writers consistently overestimated their time spent revising and effort in planning/generation, with no improvement after practice.

Conclusions:

  • Writing subprocesses exhibit distinct temporal patterns and individual stylistic variations.
  • Writers' metacognitive awareness of their time and effort allocation is limited.
  • A time-and-effort-based analysis offers a more objective framework for understanding and improving the writing process.