Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identifying objects from a haptic glance

R L Klatzky1, S J Lederman

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA.

Perception & Psychophysics
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Figure/Ground Segmentation via a Haptic Glance: Attributing Initial Finger Contacts to Objects or Their Supporting Surfaces.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Tactile and Haptic Illusions.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Please Touch: Object Properties that Invite Touch.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Using visual codes for comparisons of pictures.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Labeling effects on memory for nonsense pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Haptic Classification of Facial Identity in 2D Displays: Configural versus Feature-Based Processing.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2010
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Object recognition is possible even with limited touch information during a haptic glance. Top-down processing, like cues, aids recognition when tactile data is constrained.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Haptic Perception

Background:

  • Object recognition typically relies on rich sensory input.
  • Haptic perception under severe constraints (haptic glance) challenges traditional recognition models.
  • Understanding tactile information processing is crucial for human-computer interaction and robotics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate object recognition capabilities under brief haptic exposure (haptic glance).
  • To determine the influence of object properties (size, diagnostic attribute) and cuing on tactile object identification.
  • To explore the role of global vs. local feature extraction in haptic object recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed object identification tasks with limited haptic exposure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included common objects varying in size and diagnostic attribute (texture/shape).
  • Experimental conditions involved different cuing strategies: no cue, superordinate cue, or superordinate and basic-level cue.

    • Main Results:

    • Object recognition accuracy exceeded 20% even without cues, indicating extraction of material and local shape information.
    • Performance improved significantly with the introduction of cues.
    • Exposure duration effects were more pronounced under minimal cuing, suggesting top-down processing compensates for limited sensory data.

    Conclusions:

    • Object recognition can occur without complete extraction of global volumetric primitives.
    • Tactile object recognition under constraints relies on both local features and top-down processing.
    • Cuing strategies effectively enhance haptic object identification, particularly when sensory information is limited.