Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sweden: no easy choices

J Calltorp1

  • 1Nordic School of Public Health, Göteborg, Sweden.

British Medical Bulletin
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sweden

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2000
Same author

The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2000
Same author

[All physicians--not only physicians in charge need leadership training].

Lakartidningen·2000
Same author

[Big differences in leadership and management training within health care services. Leadership and issues concerning cooperation should be more emphasized in basic medical education].

Lakartidningen·2000
Same author

[A new series: scientific theory--an important research tool if correctly used].

Lakartidningen·1999
Same author

[Quality development in health care--time for strategic choices! Open account challenging but inevitable].

Lakartidningen·1999
Same journal

Augmentation in Achilles tendon repair: evidence versus enthusiasm.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Regional musculoskeletal pain in workers-is the traditional medical model increasing disability?

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Human health in relation to visible, functional, and accessible green space: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Muscle herniae in exercise-induced leg pain: diagnostic pitfalls and the 'repair paradox'.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Scaffolds and platelet concentrates in bone regenerative medicine: applications, mechanisms, and future approaches.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Back squat and deadlift fatiguing protocols elicit distinct countermovement jump profiles: phase-specific predictors and soreness responses.

British medical bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Medical ethics
  • Public health administration

Background:

  • The Swedish healthcare model, a cornerstone of the welfare society, faced challenges in openly discussing limitations.
  • A significant decrease in the healthcare sector's GDP fraction over ten years led to visible real cuts.
  • These factors prompted a public discussion on healthcare choices and prioritization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the historical difficulties in discussing healthcare choices and prioritization in Sweden.
  • To analyze the impact of economic constraints on public healthcare discourse.
  • To present the findings and recommendations of a parliamentary committee on healthcare ethics and prioritization.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the Swedish healthcare model's socio-political context.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of economic trends impacting the healthcare sector.
  • Examination of a 1995 parliamentary committee report on healthcare ethics and prioritization.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare's symbolic status as a welfare society cornerstone hindered open discussion of limits.
    • Visible budget cuts spurred a public debate on healthcare choices.
    • A parliamentary committee proposed an 'ethical platform' and prioritization guidelines.

    Conclusions:

    • The Swedish healthcare system's evolution necessitated a move towards explicit discussions on choices and prioritization.
    • An ethical framework is crucial for navigating resource allocation in healthcare.
    • Guidelines for political-administrative and clinical prioritization were established.