Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks

J L Epelboim1, R M Steinman, E Kowler

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park 20742-4411, USA.

Vision Research
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution of disparity to the perception of 3D shape as revealed by bistability of stereoscopic Necker cubes.

Seeing and perceiving·2013
Same author

Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements.

Journal of vision·2010
Same author

Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

Experimental brain research·2007
Same author

Coarse-to-fine eye movement strategy in visual search.

Vision research·2007
Same author

Patterns of EMG-EMG coherence in limb dystonia.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2004
Same author

ReN-1869 [(R)-1-(3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-propyl)-3-piperidine carboxylic acid], a novel histamine H1 receptor antagonist, produces potent and selective antinociceptive effects on dorsal horn neurons after inflammation and neuropathy.

The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics·2004
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Eye and head movements during tapping and looking tasks were analyzed. Visual search is key, improving performance especially with heavy memory loads, though looking alone is less efficient than tapping.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Understanding eye and head movements is crucial for analyzing task performance.
  • Previous research has explored visual search but often in constrained environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare eye and head movement patterns during target tapping versus merely looking.
  • To investigate the role of visual search in different tasks and its interaction with memory load.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded eye and head movements of unrestrained subjects performing tapping and looking tasks.
  • Analyzed scanning patterns, movement speeds, and gaze-shift accuracies.
  • Manipulated memory load to assess its impact on task performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Scanning patterns were consistent across both tasks, with targets fixated before tapping.
  • Visual search speed and accuracy were similar in both tasks.
  • Looking tasks were slower and showed less improvement with practice compared to tapping.
  • Reduced memory load disproportionately benefited looking over tapping, indicating more efficient memory use during tapping.

Conclusions:

  • Eye movement strategies differ between looking and tapping tasks.
  • Visual search is an integral process that can enhance performance, particularly under high memory demands.
  • Memory efficiency is greater during tapping than during looking.