Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implementing comprehensive quality control in the andrology laboratory

S Clements1, I D Cooke, C L Barratt

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessop Hospital for Women, Sheffield, UK.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitigation strategies for time-resolved x-ray diagnostic data degradation due to high neutron yield of ICF experiments at the NIF.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same author

THE MEDICAL TREATMENT OF MILD ENDOMETRIOSIS.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2017
Same author

Making time for what's important: what elements should we value when planning practice-based professional training?

British dental journal·2016
Same author

A retrospective study of peanut and tree nut allergy: Sensitization and correlations with clinical manifestations.

Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)·2015
Same author

Risks of donor insemination.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same author

Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2012
Same journal

ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Evidence for de novo synthesis of corticosteroids in the human ovary.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Characterizing endometriosis and adenomyosis symptom clusters and their impact on quality of life in the All of Us Research Program.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

A new regulatory framework: impact of the SoHO Regulation for medically assisted reproduction.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Subfertility in relation to gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes: the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Pathogenic variants in ACTRT3 lead to male infertility characterized by fertilization defects.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Implementing robust quality control in semen analysis ensures accurate results. This involves monitoring tests like sperm counts and morphology assessments using established methods for reliable andrology laboratory data.

Area of Science:

  • Andrology
  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Quality Management

Background:

  • Routine semen analysis is crucial for male fertility assessment.
  • Standardization and quality control are essential for reliable diagnostic results.
  • Existing quality control methods from clinical chemistry can be adapted for andrology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To integrate comprehensive quality control procedures into routine semen analysis.
  • To monitor key semen parameters including sperm count, motility, and morphology.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of quality control methods in an andrology laboratory setting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Levey-Jennings and cumulative sum (cusum) charts for monitoring.
  • Employed video-taped control samples for computerized semen analysis (CASA).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monitored daily manual sperm counts against CASA values and assessed morphology from multiple slide readings.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality control charts effectively monitored immunobead-binding tests and CASA parameters.
    • Coefficients of variation were calculated, with some metrics (e.g., CASA) being more appropriate than others (e.g., morphology).
    • Difference from previous readings proved more useful for morphology assessment than standard CVs.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrated quality control procedures directly influenced laboratory result production.
    • Comprehensive quality control, alongside technician training, assures the validity of semen analysis results.
    • Adapted clinical chemistry quality control methods enhance the reliability of andrology laboratory diagnostics.