Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Causation and complexity: old lessons, new crusades

T V Layng1

  • 1Malcolm X College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contingency adduction of "symbolic aggression" by pigeons.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2012
Same author

On terms and procedures: Fluency.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Toward a functional analysis of delusional speech and hallucinatory behavior.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Animal models of psychopathology: the establishment, maintenance, attenuation, and persistence of head-banging by pigeons.

Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry·1999
Same author

Breaking the structuralist barrier. Literacy and numeracy with fluency.

The American psychologist·1992

Inferring the causal efficacy of human thought is challenging. Research suggests public responses offer weak evidence for causality, advocating for selectionist approaches to study private events in behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Revisits foundational experimental work on inferring causality from public indicators of private mental states.
  • Highlights limitations in using matches between observed responses and inferred rules as strong causal evidence.
  • Introduces Wittgenstein's skeptical challenge regarding the inference of mental causality.

Discussion:

  • Examines the evidential problems in attributing causal efficacy to human thought.
  • Discusses the implications of inferring causality for understanding human behavior.
  • Critically evaluates the strength of evidence derived from public indicator responses.

Key Insights:

  • Public indicator responses provide only weak evidence for the causal efficacy of private mental states.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inferring causality of thought is complicated by philosophical skepticism and methodological challenges.
  • Selectionist approaches offer a promising framework for studying the role of private events.

    • Outlook:

    • Suggests a selectionist framework for future research on private events and behavior.
    • Encourages biobehavioral scientists to adopt novel approaches for complex behavioral investigations.
    • Emphasizes the need for robust methodologies to understand the interplay between thought and behavior.