Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control for SPECT systems

L S Graham1

  • 1West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP): a genomic landscape study.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Dodging the Malpractice Bullet.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Avoiding the "Sue Syndrome".

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

A need to know.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Gastric emptying of oil from solid and liquid meals. Effect of human pancreatic insufficiency.

Digestive diseases and sciences·1996
Same author

Relationships of the WISC-R and K-BIT for an adolescent clinical sample.

Adolescence·1996
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Rosai-Dorfman Disease: Imaging and Updates.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Spectrum of Breast Sarcomas with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Postdeployment Monitoring and Surveillance Methods, Guidelines, and Possibilities for AI in Radiology.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Clinical Correlation for Imaging of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Imaging Insights Beyond the Operating Room.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
See all related articles

Implementing a comprehensive quality control program with regular acceptance testing is crucial for ensuring optimal performance and reliable diagnostic imaging from scintillation cameras and tomographic systems. This ensures accurate patient diagnoses and maximizes the benefit of nuclear medicine procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Quality Control

Background:

  • Effective quality control (QC) programs are essential for nuclear medicine imaging.
  • Acceptance tests verify scintillation camera specifications and evaluate parameters impacting image quality.
  • Initial QC tests establish benchmarks for ongoing performance monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a comprehensive QC program for scintillation cameras and tomographic systems.
  • To emphasize the importance of both vendor-specified and additional critical parameters.
  • To ensure optimal performance and diagnostic accuracy in nuclear medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Daily flood field image evaluation.
  • Weekly spatial resolution testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Periodic evaluation of system sensitivity, collimator uniformity, dead time, and spatial registration.
  • Specific tests for single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) systems, including center-of-rotation calibration and detector registration verification.
  • Flood corrections and pixel size calibration for SPECT systems.
  • Review of clinical studies for patient movement and view completeness.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured QC program identifies and addresses potential issues affecting image quality.
    • Regular testing ensures systems meet specifications and perform optimally.
    • SPECT systems require additional calibration to prevent resolution loss and ensure accurate corrections.
    • Diligent QC leads to improved diagnostic confidence and patient care.

    Conclusions:

    • A rigorous and comprehensive QC program is indispensable for nuclear medicine imaging.
    • Consistent testing, from daily checks to less frequent in-depth evaluations, is vital.
    • Adherence to a thorough QC protocol is the only way to guarantee maximum patient benefit and reliable clinical interpretations.