Difference in types of radiation-induced structural chromosome aberrations and their incidences between Chinese and...

The effects of ionizing radiations on sperm chromosomes were studied in the Chinese hamster (Crisetulus griseus) and the Syrian (golden) hamster (Mesocrisetus auratus). Testes of mature male Chinese hamsters (CH) were irradiated with X-rays (0.91, 1.82 and 3.63 Gy) and gamma-rays (1.10, 2.15, 2.95 and 4.01 Gy) at a single acute dosage, whereas the irradiation was done with lower doses of X-rays (0.45, 0.91 and 1.82 Gy) and gamma-rays (0.49, 0.99 and 1.98 Gy) in mature male Syrian hamsters (SH), taking the higher radiosensitivity of this species into consideration. They were mated with normal females within 6 days of exposure. Sperm-derived chromosomes were analyzed in 1125 and 1966 fertilized ova of the CH and the SH, respectively. In both species, there was no great difference in the induction of structural chromosome aberrations between X-irradiated and gamma-irradiated spermatozoa. Chromosome-type aberrations were predominantly induced. The incidence of breakage-type aberrations increased linearly, and that of exchange-type aberrations linear-quadratically with increase of dosage. A species-specific difference in chromosomal radiosensitivity of spermatozoa was clear. In spite of the same radiation dosage, the incidence of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa in the SH was about twice as high as that in the CH (e.g. 27.0% vs. 14.7% at 0.91 Gy of X-rays). The incidences of breakage-type aberrations (69-89%) were far higher than those of exchange-type aberrations (11-31%) in the SH, while the disparity of the two incidences was much smaller in the CH (46-65% vs. 35-54%). Exchange-type aberrations consisted of both chromosome-type and chromatid-type in the SH, while almost all of them were of the chromosome-type in the CH. These results suggest that the DNA-repairing capacity of oocytes is much higher in the CH than in the SH. Moreover, it seems likely that radiation-induced sperm DNA damage is repaired with both pre-replication repair (excision repair) and post-replication repair systems in SH oocytes, whereas the excision repair system operate most exclusively in CH oocytes.