Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rheumatoid arthritis. Outcome measures

H E Paulus1, K J Bulpitt

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA School of Medicine, USA.

Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Rheumatologists pioneered outcome measures for drug trials, establishing clinical usefulness. Modern rheumatoid arthritis management relies on these standardized outcome measures for patient care decisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TJ-114 (Sairei-To), an Herbal Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases·2008
Same author

Assessment of American College of Rheumatology quality criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a pre-quality criteria patient cohort.

Arthritis and rheumatism·2007
Same author

Development and validation of the revised Cedars-Sinai health-related quality of life for rheumatoid arthritis instrument.

Arthritis and rheumatism·2006
Same author

Application of explicit process of care measurement to rheumatoid arthritis: Moving from evidence to practice.

Arthritis and rheumatism·2006
Same author

ACR remission criteria and response criteria.

Clinical and experimental rheumatology·2006
Same author

Consensus recommendations for the assessment and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

The Journal of rheumatology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Rheumatology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Rheumatologists have historically led the development of clinical outcome assessment measures.
  • Early studies utilized rigorous trial designs and standardized outcome measures to evaluate drug efficacy, particularly for treatments with delayed benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the historical significance of outcome measures in rheumatology.
  • To emphasize the evolution and importance of standardized outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) research and clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of seminal studies in clinical outcome assessment within rheumatology.
  • Identification of key historical indices and questionnaires used in RA trials.
  • Discussion of the progression of outcome measure development since the mid-20th century.

Main Results:

  • The Lansbury Index (1958) and Empire Rheumatism Gold Trial (1960) demonstrated the utility of double-blind, placebo-controlled designs with standardized outcome measures.
  • The Health Assessment Questionnaire and Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales emerged in 1980, further advancing RA outcome assessment.
  • Established outcome measures provide the foundation for evidence-based clinical decision-making in RA management.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized outcome measures are crucial for evaluating drug efficacy and guiding clinical management in rheumatology.
  • The ongoing development and application of outcome measures are essential for advancing patient care in rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Future clinical decision-making paradigms for rheumatoid arthritis will increasingly integrate established outcome measures.

Related Experiment Videos