Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simulation of laboratory errors and their effects on interlaboratory quality-control programs

M Lever, D J Munster

    Clinical Biochemistry
    |April 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optical coherence tomography angiography as non-invasive tool for detection of characteristics patterns in circumscribed choroidal hemangioma.

    International journal of retina and vitreous·2026
    Same author

    Paternal Role of Fathers in Families of Parents With Intellectual Disabilities: Views, Barriers and Facilitators in Fulfilling This Role.

    Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2025
    Same author

    Immunosuppressive human anti-CD83 monoclonal antibody depletion of activated dendritic cells in transplantation.

    Leukemia·2015
    Same author

    Duplication of 17q11.2 and Features of Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy Secondary to Methylation Defects within the GNAS Cluster: Coincidence or Causal?

    Case reports in genetics·2013
    Same author

    Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b due to paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20q.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2012
    Same author

    Novel Tandem Duplication in Exon 1 of the SNURF/SNRPN Gene in a Child with Transient Excessive Eating Behaviour and Weight Gain.

    Molecular syndromology·2012
    Same journal

    Analytical outlier rates for Roche fifth generation cardiac troponin T stat using biotin sensitive and insensitive reagent lots.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation of hemoglobin interference thresholds for chemical urinalysis panels.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Integrated genomic and biochemical diagnosis of a novel homozygous start-loss variant in AKR1D1 associated with neonatal cholestasis.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Agreement between POC glucose meters and blood gas analyzers varies across ICU patient populations.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Response to the letter to the editor: From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    See all related articles

    This study explains how to differentiate random and systematic errors in analytical methods. Linear regression analysis is key to distinguishing error types, especially in interlaboratory quality control programs.

    Area of Science:

    • Analytical Chemistry
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Analytical methods are subject to random and non-random (systematic) errors.
    • Distinguishing between these error types is crucial for accurate results.
    • Interlaboratory quality control programs face challenges in error differentiation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a framework for distinguishing random and systematic errors in analytical methods.
    • To highlight the utility of linear regression analysis in error assessment.
    • To guide the appropriate use of Youden diagrams for preliminary error reporting.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of additive error components (response-dependent and -independent).
    • Modeling non-linear assay responses and unsuitable standardization.
    • Application of linear regression analysis to identify error patterns in quality control data.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Use of Youden diagrams for paired specimen analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Linear regression is effective for distinguishing error forms, particularly when response-dependent random errors are not dominant.
    • A wide concentration range is recommended for regression analysis, mirroring clinical application ranges.
    • Youden diagrams are suitable for preliminary reporting of paired specimen results.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic and random errors can be distinguished using appropriate statistical methods like linear regression.
    • Careful consideration of analytical method parameters and data presentation is essential for accurate error assessment.
    • The findings support improved quality control and reliability in analytical measurements.