Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting

M R Cadinu1, M Rothbart

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1227, USA.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

In minimal group studies, people favor their in-group by using self-judgments (self-anchoring) or assuming groups are opposites (differentiation). Findings show in-group members self-anchor, while others differentiate groups.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1995
Same author

Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1990
Same author

Category learning and change: differences in sensitivity to information that enhances or reduces intercategory distinctions.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1989
Same author

Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1988
Same author

Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1988
Same author

In-group-out-group differences in the perceived efficacy of coercion and conciliation in resolving social conflict.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1988

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • In-group favoritism is a common social phenomenon.
  • Minimal group paradigm studies reveal biases even without prior interaction.
  • Understanding the cognitive processes driving these biases is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the psychological processes underlying in-group favoritism in minimal groups.
  • To test the roles of self-anchoring and differentiation in intergroup bias.
  • To examine the directionality of inference between self and in-group judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using the minimal group paradigm.
  • Participants rated themselves and target groups on trait information.
  • The order of self- and group-ratings was manipulated, alongside categorization status.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 4 directly assessed inference direction using feedback on unfamiliar dimensions.

    • Main Results:

    • In-group judges predominantly used self-anchoring for group judgments.
    • Out-group and uncategorized judges tended towards differentiation, assuming group opposition.
    • Participants showed a stronger tendency to generalize from self to in-group than vice versa.

    Conclusions:

    • In-group favoritism in minimal groups stems from both self-anchoring and differentiation processes.
    • The specific process employed appears to depend on the judge's group membership.
    • Self-to-in-group generalization is more prevalent than in-group-to-self generalization.