Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
Effect of polyene macrolide antibiotics on invertebrate tissue culture cells
Abstract:
The effect of amphotericin B (AB) and amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) on viability and DNA synthesis in three insect cell lines, Trichoplusia ni (Tn) Carpocapsa pomonella 169 (Cp) and Aedes aegypti (Aa), has been evaluated. In all cases AME was less toxic than AB and inhibited DNA synthesis to a lesser degree than AB. However, the three cell lines differed in their response to the two polyene macrolide antibiotic preparations. Tn and Aa cell responded in a similar manner when exposed to either AME or AB, whereas Cp cells were more sensitive to both antibiotics than Tn or Aa cells.
Insights
Amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) showed lower toxicity and DNA synthesis inhibition than amphotericin B (AB) across three insect cell lines. However, Carpocapsa pomonella cells exhibited higher sensitivity to both antifungals.
Area of Science:
- * Insect Cell Line Research
- * Antifungal Drug Development
- * Molecular Biology
Background:
- * Polyene macrolide antibiotics, such as amphotericin B (AB), are crucial antifungal agents.
- * Understanding their differential effects on various insect cell lines is important for potential applications.
- * Amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) is a derivative of AB with potentially altered properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To evaluate the impact of amphotericin B (AB) and amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) on insect cell viability.
- * To assess the effects of AB and AME on DNA synthesis in selected insect cell lines.
- * To compare the differential responses of various insect cell lines to these two antifungal agents.
Main Methods:
- * Exposure of three insect cell lines—Trichoplusia ni (Tn), Carpocapsa pomonella 169 (Cp), and Aedes aegypti (Aa)—to AB and AME.
- * Assessment of cell viability following antibiotic treatment.
- * Measurement of DNA synthesis rates in treated cell lines.
Main Results:
- * Amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) demonstrated reduced toxicity and less inhibition of DNA synthesis compared to amphotericin B (AB) across all tested cell lines.
- * Significant differences in sensitivity to both AB and AME were observed among the three insect cell lines.
- * Carpocapsa pomonella (Cp) cells were found to be more sensitive to both AB and AME than Trichoplusia ni (Tn) and Aedes aegypti (Aa) cells.
Conclusions:
- * Amphotericin B methyl ester (AME) presents a potentially safer alternative to amphotericin B (AB) for applications involving insect cell lines, due to its lower toxicity.
- * Insect cell lines exhibit distinct sensitivities to polyene macrolide antibiotics, with Cp cells being notably more susceptible.
- * These findings are crucial for optimizing the use of AB and AME in insect cell-based research and biotechnological applications.

