Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiographic sizing for meniscal transplantation

M E Pollard1, Q Kang, E E Berg

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA.

Arthroscopy : the Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a radiographic method to estimate the size of meniscal implants using bony landmarks. Menisci were marked with a radiopaque material and imaged to determine their relationship to the tibial eminence and metaphysis. Measurements from anteroposterior and lateral films were used to calculate meniscal width and length. The method showed a 7.8% average error after correcting for magnification. The researchers propose that this approach can be used in clinical settings to improve implant sizing accuracy. The method relies on standard radiographs rather than advanced imaging techniques. It could help surgeons select the correct implant size before surgery. The findings suggest the method is reliable enough for preoperative planning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrophysiological Interference for Deep Brain Modulation.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Carbon Mineralization in Fractured Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review.

Reviews of geophysics (Washington, D.C. : 1985)·2024
Same author

[Effect of deletion of protein 4.1R on proliferation, apoptosis and glycolysis of hepatocyte HL-7702 cells].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2024
Same author

Predictive value of endometrial receptivity evaluated by three-dimensional ultrasound in ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2023
Same author

[Diagnostic value of novel hepatic fibrosis markers in assessing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C].

Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology·2023
Same author

[Preliminary application of the Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score combined with the quantitative fecal occult blood in colorectal neoplasia screening].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2021

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Medical imaging techniques
  • Musculoskeletal reconstruction

Background:

Meniscal damage can lead to long-term joint degeneration. Current replacement strategies require precise sizing to ensure functional outcomes. While imaging is commonly used, direct measurement of meniscal dimensions remains challenging. Standardized radiographic methods for sizing are limited. This uncertainty drives the need for reliable, non-invasive sizing techniques. Prior research has shown the importance of anatomical landmarks in surgical planning. However, no prior work had resolved how to translate those landmarks into measurable dimensions. This gap motivated the development of a reproducible radiographic method. Such a method could streamline preoperative planning and implant selection.

Purpose Of The Study:

This investigation aimed to establish a radiographic method for sizing meniscal implants. The goal was to use bony landmarks to derive accurate meniscal dimensions. The study focused on both medial and lateral menisci. The researchers wanted to determine if radiographs could reliably predict size. They also sought to quantify the relationship between meniscal dimensions and tibial landmarks. The motivation came from the need for implant specificity in transplantation. No prior work had tested this approach using cadaveric specimens. The method could improve the accuracy of implant sizing in clinical settings.

Keywords:
meniscal replacementradiographic measurementtibial landmarksorthopedic imaging

Frequently Asked Questions

Meniscal width is estimated as the distance from the tibial eminence to the tibial metaphysis on anteroposterior films.

Meniscal length is measured from lateral radiographs as a percentage of the tibial plateau's sagittal length.

Magnification correction ensures accurate dimensional estimates by accounting for imaging distortions.

Tibial eminence and metaphysis serve as reproducible reference points for meniscal measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used cadaveric knee specimens for its analysis. Menisci were marked with a radiopaque tantalum powder-cyanoacrylic mixture. Radiographs were taken to capture the meniscal outlines and bony structures. The images were analyzed for reproducibility and dimensional accuracy. Measurements were corrected for magnification effects. The tibial eminence and metaphysis were used as reference points. Medial and lateral menisci were evaluated separately. The researchers compared radiographic measurements to actual anatomical dimensions.

Main Results:

The radiographic method showed consistent relationships between menisci and bony landmarks. Meniscal width was measured as the distance from the tibial eminence to the tibial metaphysis. On anteroposterior films, this distance correlated with actual width. Lateral radiographs were used to measure meniscal length. The medial meniscal length was 80% of the tibial plateau's sagittal length. The lateral meniscal length was 70% of the same measurement. The average error in these measurements was 7.8%. These findings suggest the method is reasonably accurate for implant sizing.

Conclusions:

The study supports the use of radiographic landmarks for meniscal sizing. The method provides a reproducible way to estimate implant dimensions. The tibial eminence and metaphysis serve as reliable reference points. The researchers propose that this approach can be applied in clinical practice. The 7.8% error rate is acceptable for preoperative planning. The method does not require advanced imaging techniques. It could reduce the need for intraoperative adjustments. The authors suggest further validation in live patients.

Failed At:

2026-07-14T07:37:09.304054+00:00

The average error in meniscal size estimation is 7.8%.

The method could improve preoperative planning and reduce intraoperative adjustments.