Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical experimentation. Lessons from lung volume reduction surgery

M R Tonelli1, J O Benditt, R K Albert

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Chest
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Empowering the individual with ALS at the end-of-life: disease-specific advance care planning.

Muscle & nerve·2001
Same author

Why alternative medicine cannot be evidence-based.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

The limits of evidence-based medicine.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

A phase I study of aerosolized administration of tgAAVCF to cystic fibrosis subjects with mild lung disease.

Human gene therapy·2001
Same author

New and emerging therapies for pulmonary complications of cystic fibrosis.

Drugs·2001
Same author

Evaluation and management of patients with pulmonary disease before thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2001

New medical interventions, like lung volume reduction surgery, are often used before thorough safety and efficacy studies. This highlights a double standard in evaluating surgical versus drug therapies, hindering evidence-based medicine.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Science
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Novel therapies are frequently adopted without adequate evaluation.
  • Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema exemplifies this issue.
  • A disparity exists in the scrutiny of surgical versus pharmacologic interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the inadequate evaluation of new medical and surgical interventions.
  • To underscore the ethical and scientific inconsistencies in adopting novel therapies.
  • To advocate for rigorous pre-implementation assessment of all new treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of the introduction of lung volume reduction surgery versus pharmacologic interventions for emphysema.
  • Examination of the medical community's practices regarding new procedure adoption.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of informed consent requirements for experimental versus standard therapies.

    • Main Results:

    • Widespread utilization of new procedures often precedes comprehensive safety and efficacy studies.
    • A double standard exists, with surgical innovations facing less rigorous evaluation than drugs.
    • Current practices impede the fulfillment of evidence-based medicine principles.

    Conclusions:

    • Medical practitioners must recognize the experimental nature of new procedures.
    • Informed consent for experimental therapies differs significantly from standard practice.
    • Systematic evaluation of all new medical and surgical interventions is crucial for advancing evidence-based medicine.