Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy

M D Williams1, J N Collins, T F Wright

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36693, USA.

Southern Medical Journal
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antimicrobial activity of cuprous oxide-coated and cupric oxide-coated surfaces.

The Journal of hospital infection·2022
Same author

Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, cetuximab, and cetuximab, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by local therapy in previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2019
Same author

Central Nervous System and Head and Neck Histiocytoses: A Comprehensive Review on the Spectrum of Imaging Findings.

Neurographics (2011)·2018
Same author

How phenotype guides management of the neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2018
Same author

The effect of Nordic hamstring exercise training volume on biceps femoris long head architectural adaptation.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2018
Same author

Imaging of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same journal

SMA's 6th Annual Physicians-in-Training Leadership Conference Abstract Presentations.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same journal

Potential Impact of Lower Federal Loan Availability on Medical Education in Appalachia.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same journal

Experiential Mentorship Skills Training: The Effect on Real-Life Mentoring.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same journal

Social Pressure: How Early Social Context Shapes Career Interest in Medicine.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same journal

Comparing Speed and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same journal

Don't Wait to Talk about Weight: A 2-Hour Interactive Curriculum Improves Medical Student Skills with Weight Management.

Southern medical journal·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a safe and effective procedure, but it is significantly more expensive than open appendectomy (OA) with no major clinical advantages. This study confirms LA offers no significant benefits over OA despite higher costs.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Initial retrospective reviews indicated laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) provided no significant benefits over open appendectomy (OA).
  • LA was noted to be substantially more expensive than OA, prompting further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) compared to open appendectomy (OA).
  • To determine if the increased cost of LA is justified by improved patient outcomes or reduced recovery times.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective clinical study involving 57 patients randomized to either LA (n=19) or OA (n=18).
  • Comparison of operative risk factors, including age, sex, and BMI, between the two groups.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of key postoperative outcomes: operating time, analgesic use, hospital stay, and return to normal activity.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences were observed between LA and OA in operative risk profiles.
    • Mean operating times, postoperative analgesic requirements, hospital stay duration, and time to return to normal activity showed no significant variations.
    • Laparoscopic appendectomy incurred significantly higher total hospital costs ($4,600 +/- $160) compared to open appendectomy ($1,700 +/- $70).

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective surgical option for appendicitis.
    • Despite its safety and efficacy, laparoscopic appendectomy offers no substantial clinical advantages over open appendectomy.
    • The higher cost associated with laparoscopic appendectomy is not currently justified by significant improvements in patient outcomes or recovery.