Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Organ donation consanguinity or universality

R R Kishore

    Medicine and Law
    |January 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Exploring organ transplantation requires an open-minded approach, focusing on optimal utilization of live human body sources. Laws should not restrict individual arrangements for organ donation, especially to save lives, as societal integration supports stranger donations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A new era dawns on sickle cell disease in India.

    The Indian journal of medical research·2023
    Same author

    Vincent Lambert, Dignity in Dying and the European Court: A Critical Evaluation and the Global Reflections.

    European journal of health law·2016
    Same author

    Aruna Shanbaug and the right to die with dignity: the battle continues.

    Indian journal of medical ethics·2016
    Same author

    Biomedical research and mining of the poor: the need for their exclusion.

    Science and engineering ethics·2006
    Same author

    Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited.

    Journal of medical ethics·2005
    Same author

    Emerging health order, values and the law: conflicts and resolution.

    Medicine and law·2004
    Same journal

    CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

    Medicine and law·2019
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Transplantation Medicine
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Current legal and ethical frameworks for organ donation and transplantation are insufficient.
    • The scarcity of organs for transplantation poses a significant challenge, potentially leading to illicit trade and crime.
    • Societal integration and individual autonomy are key considerations in organ donation policies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically analyze the ethical and legal dimensions of organ trading and transplantation.
    • To advocate for an open-minded approach to organ utilization and donation policies.
    • To address the urgent need for organ supply and prevent unethical practices.

    Main Methods:

    • Ethical analysis of existing laws and societal norms regarding human body parts.
    Keywords:
    Health Care and Public HealthWorld Health Assembly

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the concept of societal integration and its implications for organ donation.
  • Review of arguments for and against unrestricted organ donation, including from strangers.

    • Main Results:

    • Existing frameworks do not adequately address the issue of organ trading.
    • Live human bodies are a vital source for organs and tissues, necessitating exploration of optimal utilization.
    • Restricting organ donations based on genetic relations or societal atomization is unwarranted; stranger donations are ethically permissible.
    • Individual autonomy in disposing of body parts for valid consideration is not immoral.
    • Commercialization should be managed through efficient enforcement, not by limiting access to organs for needy recipients.

    Conclusions:

    • An open-minded, holistic approach is crucial for organ transplantation policy.
    • Laws should facilitate, not hinder, life-saving organ arrangements, balancing individual freedom with societal well-being.
    • Strengthening enforcement agencies is key to curbing illicit organ trade while ensuring access for legitimate needs.