[Stage IIIa endometrial carcinoma: MR findings]

[PURPOSE]: An attempt was made to evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to diagnose stage IIIa endometrial carcinoma. [MATERIALS AND METHODS]: Thirty-three patients with endometrial carcinoma underwent MR imaging and surgery. Surgical staging was classified as I in 21 patients, II in 3 patients and III in 9 patients. The MR images of each patient were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. Only the clinical diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma was previously notified. Segmental disruption of the full thickness of the myometrium was considered serosal invasion. Intraperitoneal metastasis was diagnosed according to three criteria (intraperitoneal solid mass of isointensity compared with endometrial lesion, cystic mass excluding benign ovarian cysts, ascites). These evaluations were compared with the surgical findings and analyzed by the kappa statistic. [RESULTS]: The rates of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for serosal invasion were 33% and 6%, respectively. False positive evaluation frequently occurred when thickness of the intact myometrium was less than 5mm. The rates of sensitivity and PPV for intraperitoneal metastasis were 86% and 72%, respectively. The reason for false negative evaluation was small foci of intraperitoneal metastasis. Overall, sensitivity and PPV for stage IIIa were 86% and 69%, respectively. [CONCLUSION]: MRI was useful in detecting intraperitoneal metastasis of endometrial carcinoma with the exception of diagnosing serosal invasion. It is difficult to detect small foci of peritoneal metastasis. It is necessary to differentiate adnexal metastasis from benign adnexal masses.