Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Trauma outcomes: a death analysis study

M Sugrue1, M Seger, D Sloane

  • 1Department of Trauma, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Irish Journal of Medical Science
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safe, sustainable, legal use and trade in wild species: testing a new five-dimensional sustainability assessment.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Dancing for Parkinson's: A Gateway for Connectedness to Peers and Social Assurance.

CBE life sciences education·2021
Same author

Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative infective complications on oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.

BJS open·2020
Same author

Proceedings of resources for optimal care of acute care and emergency surgery consensus summit Donegal Ireland.

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES·2017
Same author

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Rapid Response Systems and Medical Emergency Teams.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2017
Same author

A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals.

Israel journal of health policy research·2017
Same journal

Real-world antipsychotic prescribing patterns in psychotic disorders: polypharmacy, clozapine, and long-acting injectable use in a tertiary outpatient cohort.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same journal

Effects of adding Kinesiotaping to conventional physiotherapy on pain, function, and Kinesiophobia in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same journal

Neonatal predictors of neurodevelopment: the interplay between APGAR score and neonatal microbiome.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same journal

Polypharmacy in glaucoma management: a narrative review.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same journal

Weight-adjusted adenosine and first-dose conversion success in supraventricular tachycardia: a prospective cohort study.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same journal

Adenomyosis is not an independent prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
See all related articles

Peer review is crucial for evaluating trauma care adequacy. Relying solely on TRISS and ASCOT probabilities is insufficient for identifying avoidable trauma deaths, with communication breakdowns being a key factor.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Care and Patient Outcomes
  • Medical Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Assessing the quality of trauma care is essential for improving patient survival rates.
  • Existing methods for evaluating trauma mortality, such as TRISS and ASCOT, have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze survival and mortality outcomes for trauma patients at Liverpool Hospital.
  • To determine the adequacy of trauma care using TRISS, ASCOT, and peer review.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different evaluation methods for trauma care.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of survival and mortality data for 518 trauma patients meeting study criteria.
  • Utilized TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score) and ASCOT (A Severity Classification of Trauma) survival probabilities.
  • Conducted peer review to identify potentially avoidable deaths.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified significant differences in age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) between survivors and non-survivors (p < 0.001).
  • Peer review indicated 32 non-avoidable, 4 potentially avoidable, and 2 probably avoidable deaths.
  • TRISS and ASCOT showed low positive predictive value (25%) in identifying avoidable deaths.
  • Poor communication within the Area Trauma System was identified as the primary cause of avoidable deaths.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review is a more effective method than TRISS and ASCOT for identifying unexpected trauma deaths.
  • All trauma deaths warrant comprehensive peer review to ensure adequate care assessment.
  • Improving communication within the trauma system is critical for reducing avoidable mortality.