Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost effectiveness in wound care

T J Phillips

    Ostomy/Wound Management
    |January 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Calculating wound care costs and comparing treatment effectiveness is challenging due to a lack of universal definitions. Standardized methods are needed to accurately assess cost-effectiveness in wound management.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    High-precision measurement of the <i>W</i> boson mass with the CDF II detector.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
    Same author

    Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models.

    International review of neurobiology·2021
    Same author

    Maternal antioxidant treatment prevents the adverse effects of prenatal stress on the offspring's brain and behavior.

    Neurobiology of stress·2020
    Same author

    Demonstration of Muon-Beam Transverse Phase-Space Compression.

    Physical review letters·2020
    Same author

    Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption.

    Psychopharmacology·2020
    Same author

    Chondromalacia of the cranial medial femoral condyle; its occurrence and association with clinical outcome in a population of adult horses with stifle lameness.

    Equine veterinary journal·2019
    Same journal

    A Descriptive, Qualitative Study to Explore the Pain Experience During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postsurgical Abdominal Wounds.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Cultivating Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Prevention Practices in an Australian Local Health District: A Quasi-experimental Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    A Retrospective, Descriptive Analysis of Hospital-acquired Deep Tissue Injuries.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Effect of Music Therapy on Pain Perception, Anxiety, and Opioid Use During Dressing Change Among Patients With Burns in India: A Quasi-experimental, Cross-over Pilot Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Economics
    • Wound Management

    Background:

    • Objective formulas for wound care costs and cost-benefit analyses are currently unavailable.
    • This lack of standardization hinders the comparison of cost-effectiveness for different wound treatments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the literature on wound care costs and cost-effectiveness.
    • To identify challenges and inconsistencies in current cost-effectiveness studies within wound care.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review examining definitions of cost and cost-effectiveness in wound care.
    • Analysis of common methodologies and outcome measures in published cost-effectiveness studies.

    Main Results:

    • Significant confusion exists between "cost" and "cost-effectiveness" in wound care literature.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Wound care costs encompass direct (supplies, interventions) and indirect (lost workdays, litigation) components.
  • Published studies often lack standardized cost calculation methods and consistent outcome reporting, impeding direct comparisons.

    • Conclusions:

    • Accurate assessment of wound care cost-effectiveness is currently impossible due to methodological inconsistencies.
    • Clinicians must critically evaluate existing studies until universal, objective scales for cost-effectiveness measurement are developed.