Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry

W Huda1, R L Morin

  • 1University of Florida, Department of Radiology, JHMHC, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.

The British Journal of Radiology
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: implications for post-resuscitation management.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2009
Same author

Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.

Physics in medicine and biology·2008
Same author

Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2005
Same author

Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.

Pediatric radiology·2004
Same author

Acute transient sialodenopathy after the use of PAXpress.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2002
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Utility of High-Resolution Semiconductor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Breast Cancer Extent: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Airway Imaging Practices in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Global Survey to Guide Standardized Guidelines.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Effective dose equivalent (H(E)) for bone mineral densitometry (BMD) procedures like DEXA and QCT were calculated. Radiation doses from BMD are low, making radiation exposure not a primary factor in selecting BMD methods.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiology
  • Nuclear Medicine

Background:

  • Bone mineral densitometry (BMD) is crucial for diagnosing osteoporosis and monitoring treatment.
  • Accurate assessment of radiation exposure is essential for patient safety in medical imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop procedures for calculating effective dose equivalent (H(E)) for patients undergoing BMD.
  • To determine representative H(E) values for different BMD measurement techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Procedures were established to compute effective dose equivalent (H(E)).
  • H(E) values were determined for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT).

Main Results:

  • Typical DEXA measurements result in an H(E) of approximately 2.5 microSv.

Related Experiment Videos

  • QCT procedures yield H(E) values of 300 microSv (single energy) and 1 mSv (dual energy).
  • Compared to a standard abdominal X-ray (100 microSv), BMD doses are significantly lower.

    • Conclusions:

    • Patient radiation doses from BMD procedures are at the lower end of diagnostic radiology exposures.
    • Radiation dose is not a primary consideration when selecting a BMD measurement method.