Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical malpractice

B G Charlton1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical malpractice involves using flawed mathematical methods in health research, often overlooked despite its prevalence. This critical issue highlights the need for rigorous statistical oversight in scientific endeavors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limb proportions show developmental plasticity in response to embryo movement.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

The association between the development of weighing technology, possession and use of weighing scales, and self-reported severity of disordered eating.

Irish journal of medical science·2014
Same author

Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in post-mortem brain from depressed suicides.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2011
Same author

The inequity of inequality: egalitarian instincts and evolutionary psychology.

Journal of health psychology·2011
Same author

Neuroleptics revisited.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2006
Same author

Why are doctors still prescribing neuroleptics?

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2006
Same journal

A Change of Government and Its Effect on the NHS Hospital Outpatient Service.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same journal

Erratum: Model for the Organisation of a Community-Based Rehabilitation Service.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same journal

Telemedicine and beyond.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same journal

Palliative Care in General Medicine.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same journal

Medical Negligence.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same journal

In Response.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methodology
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Statistical malpractice, the misapplication of mathematical techniques in health studies, is a recognized but under-addressed problem.
  • This issue is often associated with prestigious research and funding, creating a cycle of perpetuation.
  • Academics and researchers may face pressure to produce statistically significant results, potentially leading to methodological compromises.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the phenomenon of statistical malpractice in health research.
  • To highlight the lack of accountability and criticism faced by practitioners of statistical malpractice.
  • To advocate for greater scrutiny and ethical standards in the application of statistical methods in health.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative analysis of existing literature and case studies on statistical malpractice.
  • Critical review of the incentives and reward structures within academic health research.
  • Examination of the ethical implications of misapplied statistical techniques.

Main Results:

  • Statistical malpractice is prevalent and often goes unrecognized or unaddressed within the scientific community.
  • Clever but inappropriate statistical applications are encouraged, particularly in health-related fields.
  • There is a notable absence of criticism or established mechanisms to penalize statistical malpractice.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical malpractice poses a significant threat to the reliability and validity of health research findings.
  • The scientific community must develop robust frameworks for identifying and rectifying statistical malpractice.
  • Promoting statistical rigor and ethical conduct is essential for advancing public health and medical knowledge.