Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Must reasoning

W Schaeken1, G d'Ydewalle

  • 1University of Leuven, Department of Psychology, Belgium.

Acta Psychologica
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reasoning research shows that using the word "must" in conditional rules simplifies logical inferences. This finding supports the mental model theory of reasoning by demonstrating how minimal model construction aids cognitive processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-related differences and complexity of ongoing activities in time- and event-based prospective memory.

The American journal of psychology·2001
Same author

Revisiting scene primes for object locations.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2001
Same author

The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: framing and verbal versus numerical information.

Patient education and counseling·2001
Same author

The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2000
Same author

The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words.

Acta psychologica·2000
Same author

Prospective remembering of Korsakoffs and alcoholics as a function of the prospective-memory and on-going tasks.

Neuropsychologia·2000
Same journal

Exploring the interactions between external support, internal psychological factors, and digital teaching competence: Evidence from a PLS-SEM model in Chinese rural teachers.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneity in moderation effects: How willingness-to-pay shapes the knowledge-behavior relationship in sustainable fashion consumption.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Impact of early environmental unpredictability on impulsive consumption: Insights from life history theory.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Pre-service foreign language teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT in microteaching lesson planning: A sequential mixed-methods study.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

AI-driven adaptive feedback and EFL writing performance: The roles of engagement, metacognition, and epistemic agency in a cross-linguistic context.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Crawling into a hole: Attachment insecurity, shame, and hikikomori symptoms in an adolescent population.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic
  • Human Reasoning

Background:

  • The mental model theory suggests reasoning involves constructing minimal situation models.
  • Modal conditionals involve representing and commenting on situations (permissible/impermissible).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if modus tollens inferences are easier with rules containing 'must'.
  • To validate predictions of the mental model theory regarding rule complexity and inference ease.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to assess inference performance.
  • Participants reasoned with conditional rules, some containing the auxiliary verb 'must'.

Main Results:

  • Inferences were found to be easier with rules containing 'must'.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Results indicated that 'must' rules require less explicit model elaboration.

    • Conclusions:

    • The findings corroborate the mental model theory's predictions.
    • Rule structure, specifically the presence of 'must', influences the efficiency of logical reasoning.