Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protection for patients or providers?

P L Grimaldi

    Nursing Management
    |July 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Patient advocates seek more public oversight of managed care organizations. However, managed care groups claim unfair criticism stems from providers protecting their financial interests, indicating ongoing industry conflict.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Submento-submandibular intubation: is the subperiosteal passage essential? Experience in 107 consecutive cases.

    The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2005
    Same author

    Medicare's new home health prospective payment system explained.

    Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2001
    Same author

    Unraveling Medicare's prospective payment system for hospital outpatient care.

    Journal of health care finance·2001
    Same author

    Can Medicare beneficiaries pay outpatient drug bills?

    Nursing management·2000
    Same author

    New managed-care glossary.

    Nursing management·2000
    Same author

    New risk adjustment may cut Medicare payments.

    Nursing management·1999
    Same journal

    Uncertainty in gender-affirming care: Implications for nursing leadership and organizational practice.

    Nursing management·2026
    Same journal

    Nurses' uncertainty in gender-affirming care: Implications for nursing leadership and organizational practice.

    Nursing management·2026
    Same journal

    Innovativeness: A strategic necessity.

    Nursing management·2026
    Same journal

    Improvising through ambiguity: Jazz leadership principles for nurse leaders.

    Nursing management·2026
    Same journal

    Active listening in nursing leadership: A critical analysis.

    Nursing management·2026
    Same journal

    Find Your Best Fit: An innovative orientation model cultivating connection and commitment in new graduate nurses.

    Nursing management·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Policy
    • Health Economics
    • Industry Analysis

    Background:

    • Patient advocacy groups are increasingly engaging in political actions aimed at enhancing public control over the managed care industry.
    • Managed care organizations (MCOs) perceive these actions as unfair criticism, suggesting they are often driven by provider groups prioritizing economic interests.
    • The dispute involves significant financial stakes, with billions of dollars and numerous jobs potentially affected.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the escalating conflict between patient advocates and managed care organizations.
    • To investigate the motivations behind the political actions targeting the managed care industry.
    • To understand the perspectives of managed care organizations regarding public criticism.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Qualitative analysis of political actions and public statements.
    • Review of industry-related economic data.
    • Content analysis of arguments presented by advocacy groups and MCOs.

    Main Results:

    • Patient advocates are actively pursuing policy changes for greater managed care oversight.
    • Managed care organizations assert that criticism is often a guise for protecting provider economic interests.
    • The conflict is characterized by intense debate and strategic communication ('spin-doctoring').

    Conclusions:

    • The push for increased public control over managed care is a significant trend.
    • Economic factors heavily influence the discourse surrounding managed care.
    • The conflict between stakeholders is expected to persist due to high stakes involved.