Comparison of tissue disruption caused by excimer and midinfrared lasers in clinical simulation

Laser coronary angioplasty is a useful therapy for selected complex coronary lesions. Laser-induced acoustic trauma is postulated to be a cause of dissection and acute vessel occlusion. Controversy exists regarding the relative degree of photoacoustic effects of midinfrared and excimer lasers in clinical practice. To date, these systems have not been compared at clinical energy doses and with clinical pulsing strategies. Therefore, we studied the photoacoustic effects of both midinfrared and excimer lasing at clinically accepted doses. Human atherosclerotic iliofemoral artery segments were obtained at autopsy (n = 36) and placed lumen side up in a saline bath. Clinical laser catheters were advanced over an 0.018" guide wire, perpendicular to the tissue. A 10-g down force was applied to the catheter for full-thickness lasing. Pulsing strategies were, for midinfrared laser: 5 pulses, 1-sec pause, 5 pulses, 1-sec pause, 5 pulses, withdraw; for excimer: 5 sec of pulses, wait 10 sec, 5 sec of pulses. Several clinically acceptable energy levels were used; for excimer: 25 mJ/mm2, 40 mJ/mm2, 60 mJ/mm2; for midinfrared: 3 W (400 mJ/mm2), 3.5 W (467 mJ/mm2). Photoacoustic effect was assessed histologically by determining the number of lateral cleavage planes (dissections) arising from the lased crater border and extending into the surrounding tissue. In normal tissue, midinfrared lasing produced less acoustic damage than excimer lasing (2.79 +/- 0.78 vs. 5.27 +/- 0.75 cleavage planes, mean +/- SD, P < 0.05, data for lowest energy for each system). The same was true in noncalcified atheroma (2.48 +/- 0.71 vs. 6.43 +/- 1.09, P < 0.05) and calcified atheroma (2.47 +/- 1.21 vs. 6.27 +/- 1.13, P < 0.05). This effect was similar at all energy levels, with a trend for more damage at higher energies in both systems. This study demonstrates that midinfrared lasing causes less acoustic damage than excimer lasing when using clinical catheters, energy levels, and pulsing strategies. This effect is independent of tissue-type but tends to be dose-related. These findings may explain, in part, the differences in dissection rates seen clinically.