Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Diagnostic significance of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and D-dimer in patients with deep venous
Insights
Thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) and D-dimer are effective biomarkers for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Elevated levels of TAT and D-dimer significantly indicate DVT presence and aid in acute DVT screening.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Hematology
Background:
- Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a significant clinical concern.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of DVT is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of Thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) and D-dimer in patients suspected of DVT.
- To assess the correlation between TAT, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonographically confirmed DVT.
Main Methods:
- Blood samples were collected from 50 patients with suspected DVT.
- Thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) and D-dimer levels were measured.
- Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was diagnosed using ultrasonography (compression and Doppler imaging).
Main Results:
- Patients diagnosed with DVT exhibited significantly higher TAT (20.4 +/- 19.10 micrograms/L) and D-dimer (9.0 +/- 9.21 micrograms/ml) levels compared to those without DVT (TAT: 3.8 +/- 2.36 micrograms/L; D-dimer: 0.7 +/- 0.69 micrograms/ml).
- A cutoff of TAT >= 7.0 micrograms/L and D-dimer >= 3.0 micrograms/ml demonstrated 84% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and 90% accuracy for DVT diagnosis.
- Nineteen of 23 DVT cases were acute, presenting within two weeks of symptom onset.
Conclusions:
- Thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) and D-dimer are highly valuable biochemical markers for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
- These markers show excellent accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, making them useful for screening acute DVT cases.
Abstract:
Thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) and D-dimer were measured in 50 patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) to assess the usefulness of these indicators in the diagnosis of DVT. DVT was diagnosed by ultrasonography (compression method and Doppler imaging). In patients who were negative for DVT (Group A), TAT was 3.8 +/- 2.36 micrograms/L (mean +/- SD) and D-dimer was 0.7 +/- 0.69 micrograms/ml, whereas in patients diagnosed with DVT (Group B), TAT was 20.4 +/- 19.10 micrograms/L (p < 0.001) and D-dimer was 9.0 +/- 9.21 micrograms/ml (p < 0.001). Thus, Group B had significantly higher levels of both markers. Moreover, 19 of the 23 cases in Group B had acute DVT, with symptoms appearing within 2 weeks of onset. When the cutoff for a positive diagnosis of DVT was set at TAT of 7.0 micrograms/L or more and D-dimer of 3.0 micrograms/ml or more, sensitivity was 84%, specificity was 96%, and accuracy was 90%. Based on these results, we concluded that TAT and D-dimer are extremely useful in screening for acute DVT.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

