Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative methods in nursing research

K R Abrams1, A M Scragg

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, England. kra1@le.ac.uk

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Developing a Natural History Model for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2024
Same author

Developing a Natural History Model for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2023
Same author

Jointly modelling longitudinally measured urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin and early pregnancy outcomes.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.

BMC medical research methodology·2019
Same author

Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.

BMC medical research methodology·2019
Same author

Causal inference for long-term survival in randomised trials with treatment switching: Should re-censoring be applied when estimating counterfactual survival times?

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
Same journal

Elderspeak in Healthcare Settings: How Care, Control and Personhood Intersect in Care Communication-A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

A Model for Sustaining Second Victim Peer Support Programs in Healthcare: A Delphi Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The Practice Experience of ICU Nurses in Preventing Pressure Injuries: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Capturing the Work of Nurses in General Practice: Development and Testing of the OCEAN-GPN Tools.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The European Parliament's Vote on the EU Health Workforce INI Report: An EFN Commentary.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Social Avoidance Trajectories, Core Characteristics and Maintenance Factors in Postoperative Breast Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
See all related articles

This study emphasizes estimation and confidence intervals over hypothesis testing for quantitative nursing research. These methods help assess statistical and clinical significance in nursing studies.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Research Methodology
  • Quantitative Analysis in Healthcare
  • Biostatistics in Clinical Practice

Background:

  • Quantitative research in nursing relies on statistical principles.
  • Traditional hypothesis testing is common but has limitations.
  • Assessing both statistical and clinical significance is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss general principles of quantitative nursing research.
  • To advocate for estimation and confidence intervals.
  • To illustrate these methods with nursing literature examples.

Main Methods:

  • Review of general principles in quantitative nursing research.
  • Emphasis on statistical estimation and confidence intervals.
  • Application of methods to examples from nursing literature.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Estimation and confidence intervals provide a robust approach to data analysis.
  • Confidence intervals effectively assess statistical and clinical significance.
  • The paper illustrates these concepts with practical nursing research examples.

Conclusions:

  • Estimation and confidence intervals are superior to hypothesis testing in nursing research.
  • These methods enhance the interpretation of quantitative findings in nursing.
  • Understanding these principles improves the design and analysis of nursing studies.