Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Picture archiving and communication system bandwidth and storage requirements

J C Honeyman1, W Huda, M M Frost

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.

Journal of Digital Imaging
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: implications for post-resuscitation management.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.

British journal of cancer·2014
Same author

Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2009
Same author

Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.

Physics in medicine and biology·2008
Same author

Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2005
Same author

Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.

Pediatric radiology·2004

A fully digital radiology department requires substantial storage and network bandwidth, generating ~15.7 GB daily. A distributed archive solution is recommended for optimal image access in this digital imaging environment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Informatics
  • Radiology Department Management
  • Health IT Infrastructure

Background:

  • Traditional film-based radiology workflows present challenges for data management and access.
  • The transition to digital imaging necessitates a thorough evaluation of storage and network requirements.
  • Academic radiology departments face unique demands due to research and educational activities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the image storage and network bandwidth needs for a fully digital academic radiology department.
  • To model data flow and acquisition rates in a digital radiology environment.
  • To assess the adequacy of existing Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) infrastructure.

Main Methods:

  • Integrated radiology information system (RIS) data with image production metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeled image acquisition based on departmental data.
  • Analyzed image distribution patterns to predict digital data flow.
  • Evaluated network bandwidth requirements against current PACS capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • A fully digital department would generate approximately 15.7 GB of data daily, equating to 3.5 TB annually.
    • Peak acquisition rates could reach 1.8 GB per hour, with sustained rates over 1 GB per hour during workdays.
    • Existing PACS infrastructure likely insufficient to handle projected data volumes and network traffic.
    • A distributed networked archive solution demonstrated potential for optimizing image access.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant upgrades in storage and network infrastructure are essential for a digital radiology department.
    • Current PACS may require enhancement or replacement to support digital workflows.
    • Distributed archiving strategies offer a viable solution for efficient image retrieval and management.