Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients

K F Richards1, K S Fisher, J H Flores

  • 1Intermountain Endosurgical Institute, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) significantly reduces hospital stays and patient morbidity compared to open appendectomy (OA). This minimally invasive approach offers comparable costs and faster recovery for appendectomy patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Should Europe follow the US and declare obesity a disease?: a discussion of the so-called utilitarian argument.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2017
Same author

Patients' strategies for eating after gastric bypass surgery: a qualitative study.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2015
Same author

Implementation of a trauma system in Norway: a national survey.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2015
Same author

The nuclear receptors NUR77, NURR1 and NOR1 in obesity and during fat loss.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2011
Same author

Cardiac valve replacement with mitral homograft.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2002
Same author

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the maxilla: case report and review of literature.

Periodontal clinical investigations : official publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists·2001

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Procedures
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Appendectomy is a common surgical procedure.
  • Traditional open appendectomy (OA) has established protocols.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers potential advantages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA).
  • To evaluate differences in length of stay, morbidity, cost, and patient recovery.
  • To assess the efficacy and patient experience of LA.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 720 appendectomy cases (253 LA, 467 OA) over 3 years.
  • Analysis of computer records for demographics, length of stay, OR time, and costs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Post-hospitalization recovery assessed via patient surveys.

    • Main Results:

    • LA patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (2.06 vs. 3.44 days).
    • LA demonstrated lower morbidity rates (5% vs. 14%).
    • Overall hospital costs were comparable between LA and OA ($4,800 vs. $4,950).
    • LA patients reported less pain and quicker return to work.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with reduced hospital stay and morbidity.
    • LA provides a comparable hospital cost to OA.
    • Laparoscopic appendectomy leads to quicker patient recovery and improved outcomes.