Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiographic interpretation in the emergency department

J E Brunswick1, K Ilkhanipour, D C Seaberg

  • 1University of Pittsburgh Affiliated Residency in Emergency Medicine, PA, USA.

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cryptococcal meningitis/acquired immune deficiency syndrome presenting as a transient neurologic deficit.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

Duodenal diverticula: potential complications and common imaging pitfalls.

Clinical radiology·2014
Same author

Use of a cardiocerebral-protective drug cocktail prior to countershock in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Resuscitation·2001
Same author

Ethical dilemmas in a randomized trial of asthma treatment: can Bayesian statistical analysis explain the results?

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2001
Same author

Blunt cardiac injury presenting as unsuspected ventricular tachycardia.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2001
Same author

The utility of routine electrolytes and blood cell counts in patients with chest pain.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2001
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of emergency department triage systems for predicting clinical severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of five-level triage scales.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Methanol toxicity from inhalational abuse of a methyl acetate-containing nail polish remover.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Regarding strategies, feasibility of implementations and results of HIV screening in emergency departments.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Rocuronium dosing for rapid sequence intubation: A retrospective analysis in ED and ICU settings.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Clinical features of adults with undiagnosed acute leukemia in the emergency department: A descriptive study.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Occult intraperitoneal gynecological hemorrhage: An under-evaluated source of hemoperitoneum after blunt trauma.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Emergency department physicians correctly interpret 99% of radiographs. Of misreads, less than half significantly altered patient care, indicating high accuracy in initial radiographic readings.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medical Imaging Interpretation

Background:

  • Radiographic interpretation is crucial in emergency departments.
  • Concordance between emergency physician and radiologist readings impacts patient care.
  • Assessing initial interpretation accuracy is vital for quality improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement between emergency department (ED) attending physicians and radiologists in interpreting radiographs.
  • To determine the rate of misinterpretations that led to changes in patient management.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 15,585 radiographs from January to October 1993.
  • Comparison of initial ED physician interpretations with final radiologist readings.
  • Categorization of misreads into overreads, underreads, and those requiring follow-up.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Emergency department physicians achieved a 99.0% accuracy rate in initial interpretations.
  • 120 out of 15,585 radiographs (0.77%) were misread.
  • Of the misreads, 46% were clinically significant, necessitating follow-up interventions.

Conclusions:

  • Initial radiographic interpretations by emergency department attending physicians demonstrate high accuracy.
  • The majority of misinterpretations do not significantly alter patient care pathways.
  • Radiologists' final review confirms the overall reliability of ED physician readings.