Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Megatrials are based on a methodological mistake

B G Charlton1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limb proportions show developmental plasticity in response to embryo movement.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

The association between the development of weighing technology, possession and use of weighing scales, and self-reported severity of disordered eating.

Irish journal of medical science·2014
Same author

Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in post-mortem brain from depressed suicides.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2011
Same author

The inequity of inequality: egalitarian instincts and evolutionary psychology.

Journal of health psychology·2011
Same author

Neuroleptics revisited.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2006
Same author

Why are doctors still prescribing neuroleptics?

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2006

Megatrials, despite their prestige, may contain methodological errors. Evaluating clinical trial applicability requires considering design rigor, population representativeness, and subject homogeneity, not just large sample sizes.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Megatrials are highly regarded in medical research.
  • However, their design may contain inherent methodological flaws.
  • The assumption that large sample sizes compensate for reduced experimental control is questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the methodological underpinnings of megatrials.
  • To identify key parameters for assessing the clinical applicability of randomized trials.
  • To challenge the notion of randomized trials as an infallible 'gold standard'.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the methodological assumptions in megatrial design.
  • Discussion of the relationship between sample size and experimental rigor.
  • Identification of critical parameters for trial evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Megatrials may be founded on a methodological error: assuming size compensates for reduced control.
  • There is no inherent trade-off where larger trials automatically equate to greater rigor.
  • The interpretation of megatrials necessitates significant clinical and scientific expertise.

Conclusions:

  • Randomized trials are not universally a 'gold standard'; quality varies.
  • Applicability to clinical practice depends on design rigor, population representativeness, and subject homogeneity.
  • A critical evaluation of these parameters is essential for interpreting megatrial results effectively.