Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A review of important elements in sedation study methodology

S Wilson1

  • 1Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Pediatric Dentistry
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Few studies on sedative effects use rigorous scientific methods like blinding and control groups. Standardizing sedation protocols and behavioral assessments is crucial for reliable research in pediatric dentistry.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A G protein-coupled receptor for UDP-glucose.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2001
Same author

The concentration of AS-1 RBCs after inverted gravity sedimentation for neonatal transfusions.

Transfusion·2000
Same author

Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973-1998.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2000
Same author

Down-regulation of orexin gene expression by severe obesity in the rats: studies in Zucker fatty and zucker diabetic fatty rats and effects of rosiglitazone.

Brain research. Molecular brain research·2000
Same author

Neuromedin U is a potent agonist at the orphan G protein-coupled receptor FM3.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2000
Same author

Initial management strategies for dyspepsia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2000

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Dentistry
  • Sedation Research
  • Clinical Trial Methodology

Background:

  • Limited studies evaluate behavioral indices of sedatives using sound scientific principles.
  • Physiological parameters are infrequently measured alongside behavioral indices in sedation studies.
  • Conducting rigorous clinical sedation studies is challenging, requiring extensive planning and resources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Highlight the need for standardized sedation protocols in research.
  • Emphasize the importance of blinding, reliability, and validity in behavioral assessments.
  • Advocate for comparing and contrasting drug effects across studies for confident conclusions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing studies on behavioral indices and sedatives.
  • Discussion of methodological challenges in clinical sedation research.
  • Exploration of the necessity for standardized protocols and validated behavioral scales.

Main Results:

  • Identified a scarcity of studies employing robust scientific principles (blinding, reliability, validity, control groups).
  • Noted the infrequent integration of physiological parameters with behavioral assessments.
  • Highlighted the difficulty in conducting and generalizing findings from current sedation studies.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization of sedation protocols is essential for developing a strong scientific basis for sedation research.
  • Consistent assessment and comparison of behavioral scales are needed to understand drug influences reliably.
  • Establishing blinding and reliability in behavioral measures should be a priority for future sedation studies.

Related Experiment Videos