Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive processes in odorant mixture assessment

D A Booth1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.

Chemical Senses
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physical versus psychosocial measures of influences on human obesity. Comment on Dhurandhar et al.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2015
Same author

A strawberry by any other name would smell as sweet, green, fruity and buttery. Multisensory cognition of a food aroma.

Appetite·2010
Same author

Daytime patterning of fatigue and its associations with the previous night's discomfort and poor sleep among women with primary Sjögren's syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis.

Musculoskeletal care·2010
Same author

Predictors of fatigue over 1 year among people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Psychology, health & medicine·2008
Same author

Measuring fatigue among women with Sjögren's syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the Profile of Fatigue (ProF) and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI).

Musculoskeletal care·2007
Same author

Sleep disruption frequency in rheumatoid arthritis: perceived stress predicts poor outcome over one year.

Musculoskeletal care·2007
Same journal

A method for assessing approach and avoidance behavior across multiple olfactory stimuli in mice including multivariate hypothesis comparisons.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

From Receptors to Behavior: Molecular and Functional Logic of Sensory Coding in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory System.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Vomeronasal sensory input and its social behavioral output.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Reference data for Bayesian adaptive QUEST-based taste recognitions thresholds from pooled individual participant data.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Expression of Calca gene-derived peptides in the murine taste system.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

The trigeminal function questionnaire (TriFunQ): a tool for clinical and research use.

Chemical senses·2026
See all related articles

Cain et al. (1995) compared models of odor interaction, offering a key analysis of olfactory binary mixture intensities. However, this commentary argues their critique of mixture psychophysics is insufficient.

Area of Science:

  • Olfactory science
  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory science

Background:

  • Assessing the perceived intensity of odor mixtures is complex.
  • Previous models of olfactory mixture perception have limitations.
  • Cain et al. (1995) provided a significant empirical comparison of these models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the models of olfactory binary mixture intensities.
  • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of existing mixture psychophysics.
  • To argue that the critique presented by Cain et al. (1995) is not sufficiently radical.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical comparison of various models predicting olfactory mixture intensity.
  • Critical analysis of the psychophysical tradition for studying odor mixtures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical commentary on the implications of Cain et al.'s findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Cain et al. (1995) offered the most comprehensive empirical comparison of olfactory mixture models to date.
    • Their work highlighted significant issues within the tradition of mixture psychophysics.
    • The commentary suggests their critique did not go far enough in addressing fundamental problems.

    Conclusions:

    • The assessment of odor mixture intensity models requires further radical critique.
    • Existing psychophysical approaches to odor mixtures may be fundamentally flawed.
    • A more profound re-evaluation of olfactory mixture perception research is needed.