Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical causation analysis heuristics

P Harber1, D Shusterman

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-7027, USA.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is postal postoperative follow-up in urogynaecology feasible?

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2012
Same author

Neurogenic inflammation: additional points.

Environmental health perspectives·2009
Same author

Nasal hyperreactivity in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis: a potential risk factor for non-specific building-related illness.

Indoor air·2007
Same author

Trigeminally-mediated health effects of air pollutants: sources of inter-individual variability.

Human & experimental toxicology·2007
Same author

Real-time monitoring of nasal mucosal pH during carbon dioxide stimulation: implications for stimulus dynamics.

Chemical senses·2003
Same author

Chlorine inhalation produces nasal congestion in allergic rhinitics without mast cell degranulation.

The European respiratory journal·2003
Same journal

Stress First Aid for Healthcare Workers: A Longitudinal Evaluation Across a Healthcare System.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same journal

Organizational Stressors, Burnout, and Mental Health Outcomes Among Local Government Employees During Disaster Response.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same journal

What's new in HIV Exposure Management in 2026.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same journal

Self-Reported Occupational Tuberculosis Exposure Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19-Related Health System Reprioritisation in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same journal

Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Sleep Outcomes Among Long-Haul Truck Drivers: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same journal

Work Exposome estimation through Job Exposure Matrices - JEMs?

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
See all related articles

Analyzing medical causation for work or environmental exposures is complex. This review identifies distinct methods, highlighting differences in process and assumptions, and suggests formal assessment can improve standardization.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • Environmental Health
  • Medical Toxicology

Background:

  • Medical causation analysis links patient illness to workplace or environmental factors.
  • Historically, this process has been implicit, lacking detailed methodological examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and analyze the distinct heuristics used in medical causation analysis.
  • To identify differences in the process, outcomes, and assumptions of various methods.
  • To advocate for formal assessment to improve and standardize the process.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on medical causation analysis.
  • Identification and categorization of distinct analytical heuristics.
  • Comparison of methods based on their process, outcomes, and underlying assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Several distinct heuristics are utilized, including probability-based models, epidemiological data application, and Bayesian analysis.
  • Methods vary significantly in scope, considering either only work-related causes or alternative explanations.
  • Substantial differences exist in the fundamental assumptions and outcomes of these methods.

Conclusions:

  • Medical causation analysis employs diverse, often implicit, methods.
  • Formal assessment of these methods is crucial for understanding and improving the field.
  • Standardization of medical causation analysis can enhance reliability and consistency.