Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Safety limits for nutrients

J N Hathcock1

  • 1Council for Responsible Nutrition, Washington, D.C 20036-1609, USA.

The Journal of Nutrition
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Determining safe intake levels for substances requires considering toxicity, dosage, and individual factors. Data adequacy is crucial for establishing acceptable intake margins and estimating adverse effect risks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dietary supplements: what is in the public's best interest?

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2000
Same author

Over-the-counter chromium and renal failure.

Annals of internal medicine·1997
Same author

Vitamins and minerals: efficacy and safety.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·1997
Same author

Applications of antioxidants in physiologically functional foods: safety aspects.

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition·1995
Same author

Marginal zinc status does not exacerbate pancreatic carcinogenesis associated with dietary soybean trypsin inhibitor concentrate in rats.

The Journal of nutrition·1994
Same author

Safety limits for nutrient intakes: concepts and data requirements.

Nutrition reviews·1993
Same journal

Microbial-derived polyphenol metabolites and the gut microbiota: A scoping review of clinical studies.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Hesperidin as an Emerging Nutraceutical in Modern Health and Preventive Medicine: A Narrative Review.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Livestock and Aquatic Animals: Metabolic Divergence, Physiological Functions, and Product Development.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Immunomodulatory properties of choline and its dietary forms throughout the lifespan.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Oat-rich low-gluten diet modulates plasma short-chain fatty acids without significant changes in fecal microbiome or inflammatory markers - a randomized clinical trial in people with cardiometabolic risk.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Diet and Cognitive Function in Aging: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis from Eight Cohorts in Europe and the United States.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Nutritional Science

Background:

  • Adverse health effects are influenced by a substance's toxicity, intake amount, and individual biology.
  • Safe intake levels are defined by a margin of safety below doses causing adverse effects.
  • Establishing safe intake relies on robust data to estimate the frequency of adverse responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the principles for determining safe substance intake levels.
  • To emphasize the importance of data adequacy in risk assessment.
  • To discuss methods for setting safe intake limits using safety factors.

Main Methods:

  • Review of toxicological principles and risk assessment methodologies.
  • Analysis of factors influencing the relationship between intake and adverse effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of data requirements for estimating lowest adverse effect levels.

    • Main Results:

    • Safe intake is determined by inherent toxicity, exposure levels, and individual variability.
    • The adequacy of data is paramount for accurately assessing the margin of safety.
    • Sufficient data allows for the estimation of lowest adverse effect levels, while insufficient data limits meaningful estimations.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate determination of safe intake levels necessitates comprehensive toxicological data.
    • The reliability of safety factors and intake limits is directly tied to data quality and quantity.
    • Further research may be needed to improve data for substances with infrequent or inconsistent adverse effect reports.