Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rectal carcinoma: are we making a difference?

R Hurst1, M Stamos, G Wilmoth

  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Harbor/UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90509, CA, USA.

The American Surgeon
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for dijet resonances in 7 TeV pp collisions at CMS.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Search for quark compositeness with the dijet centrality ratio in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Search for stopped Gluinos in pp collisions at square root s=7 TeV.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Opacification of lenses cultured in the presence of Pb.

Molecular vision·2010
Same author

[Expression and significance of Fas/APO-1 and Bcl-2 protein in human lung cancer.].

Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer·2010
Same author

Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in lymphoma.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2010

Improved surgical techniques and earlier diagnosis have significantly increased rectal cancer survival rates. This study highlights key factors contributing to better patient outcomes over four decades.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Rectal cancer treatment has evolved significantly since the mid-20th century.
  • Historical data suggests improvements in patient survival, prompting an analysis of contributing factors.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing current and future treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively analyze factors influencing rectal cancer patient survival from 1950-1988.
  • To identify trends in disease stage, surgical procedures, and operative mortality.
  • To correlate these factors with changes in 5-year survival rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 335 rectal cancer patients with at least 5 years of follow-up or until death.
  • Analysis of surgical procedures, including abdominal perineal resection (APR) and anterior resections.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis of operative mortality, disease stage at presentation, surgical margins, and 5-year survival rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Operative mortality for curable rectal cancer decreased from 24% (1950-1969) to 8% (1970-1988) (P < 0.01), largely due to improved APR outcomes.
    • The proportion of patients presenting with Stage IV disease decreased from 54% in the 1950s to 22% in the 1980s (P < 0.01).
    • Overall 5-year survival increased from 13% in the 1950s to 43% in the 1980s (P < 0.001), with involved surgical margins significantly reducing survival (8% vs. 37%).

    Conclusions:

    • Earlier stage at presentation and improved operative management are key independent factors improving rectal cancer survival.
    • Advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care have led to reduced operative mortality.
    • Continued focus on early detection and optimizing surgical outcomes remains critical for enhancing patient survival in rectal cancer.