Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing the tort deterrent signal: a qualitative study

N Hupert1, A G Lawthers, T A Brennan

  • 1Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between overcrowded households, multigenerational households, and COVID-19: a cohort study.

Public health·2021
Same author

Impact of a transition to more restrictive drug formulary on therapy discontinuation and medication adherence.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2016
Same author

Altering embryonic cardiac dynamics with optical pacing.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2013
Same author

Diffusion of nonlinearly scattered light by etched glass.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events.

Quality & safety in health care·2006
Same author

Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

Quality & safety in health care·2004
Same journal

Toward a typology of government-sanctioned child maltreatment: A scoping review of the harms of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of women in the slums of Guwahati city (Assam, India): A qualitative analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Violence prevention through legislative change: Qualitative insights on ending the physical punishment of children in the UK.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Physicians may not effectively learn from medical malpractice lawsuits. They prefer hospital-based quality control over legal deterrents, suggesting a need for institutional liability in medical errors.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Physician Behavior

Background:

  • Medical errors cause patient harm, but not all are negligent.
  • The medical malpractice tort system aims to compensate injured patients and deter physician negligence.
  • Deterrence relies on physicians processing lessons from tort trials, an assumption lacking empirical verification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To qualitatively assess how practicing physicians process the deterrent signal from medical malpractice tort trials.
  • To identify physician perspectives on the effectiveness of the current legal system in deterring medical negligence.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study involving interviews with 47 physicians (internists, surgeons, OB/GYNs) in New York.
  • Data collected as part of the Harvard Medical Practice Study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on how physicians perceive and respond to the tort deterrent signal.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians define medical negligence based on practitioner's moral qualities, not legal standards.
    • Physicians view lawyers and tort trials as lacking moral authority to guide medical practice.
    • Physicians expressed openness to hospital-based, physician-led quality control over confrontational legal processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians' processing of the tort deterrent signal is impeded by their definition of negligence and distrust in the legal system.
    • Physicians are more receptive to internal, educational quality improvement initiatives.
    • Findings support the concept of institutional liability for medical malpractice.