Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs

B I Cohen1, M Pagnillo, S Condos

  • 1Essential Dental Laboratories, South Hackensack, N.J., USA.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Subsolar-Mass Ultracompact Binaries in Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Longitudinal and Transverse Instability of Ion Acoustic Waves.

Physical review letters·2017
Same author

Effect of EDTA conditioning upon the retention of fibre posts luted with resin cements.

International endodontic journal·2009
Same author

Numerical investigation of transients in the SSPX Spheromak.

Physical review letters·2005
Same author

Increasing the magnetic helicity content of a plasma by pulsing a magnetized source.

Physical review letters·2004
Same author

Observation of the parametric two-ion decay instability with thomson scattering.

Physical review letters·2004

A new overdenture cap and keeper system was tested against a nylon overdenture cap system. The nylon cap required less force but was less consistent over 2000 pulls.

Area of Science:

  • Dental prosthetics
  • Materials science

Background:

  • Overdentures require reliable attachment systems for function.
  • Wear and tear from the oral environment necessitate maintenance of overdenture components.
  • Existing overdenture caps may require frequent replacement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the retentive forces of a new overdenture cap and keeper system with a conventional nylon overdenture cap system.
  • To evaluate the durability and consistency of these attachment designs over repeated use cycles.

Main Methods:

  • Two overdenture attachment designs were tested: a nylon cap system and a new cap and keeper system.
  • Retention was measured using a force gauge over 2000 pull cycles at 0 and 26 degrees.
  • Repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) was employed to analyze absolute and relative force data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant difference was found in relative force required for cap removal between the two designs (p < 0.0001).
  • The nylon cap design required less force for removal but demonstrated less consistency over 2000 pulls compared to the cap and keeper system.
  • No significant effect of angle on retention was observed for either absolute or relative force.

Conclusions:

  • The new cap and keeper system offers a potentially more durable and consistent retentive solution for overdentures compared to the tested nylon cap design.
  • Further research may explore long-term clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes.