Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gender differences in cardiovascular outcomes

R S Hartz1

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA.

International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late mediastinal shift after repeated aspiration of postpneumonectomy seroma.

Chest·2001
Same author

Effects of race, with or without gender, on operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a study using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same author

"The XX files": demographics of women cardiothoracic surgeons.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same author

Aortic thrombosis after lumbar spine surgery.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same author

Assessing quality in cardiac surgery: why this is necessary in the twenty-first century.

Perfusion·2000
Same author

Surgery for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

World journal of surgery·1999
Same journal

Effect of sperm-agglutinating antibodies on sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction.

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
Same journal

A comparative study of the effects of an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring combined with an oral gestagen versus transdermal estrogen combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: clinical findings and endometrial response.

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
Same journal

The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
Same journal

Effect of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy on lipid profile and Lp(a) level in menopausal women with hypercholesterolemia.

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
Same journal

Selective follicular reduction: what to do with the oocytes?

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
Same journal

The mind-body connection--anxiety, panic, mood and compulsion.

International journal of fertility and menopausal studies·1996
See all related articles

Gender disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment are examined. This review assesses if identified sex-based differences in CVD outcomes are justifiable and modifiable over time.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a leading cause of death in American women, exceeding all other diseases combined.
  • Significant healthcare expenditure is allocated to managing CVD, making cost containment a critical concern.
  • Ethical guidelines mandate that medical care discrepancies must be based on appropriate biological or medical indications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and identify gender-specific differences in the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
  • To evaluate the justification for observed gender-based disparities in CVD.
  • To determine if these disparities can be modified over time.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of studies comparing cardiovascular disease outcomes between genders.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of prevalence data, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies across sexes.
  • Ethical and medical justification assessment of identified gender differences.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified significant differences in CVD prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment between men and women.
    • Assessed the medical and ethical justification for these gender-based discrepancies.
    • Determined which disparities are no longer considered acceptable based on current ethical standards.

    Conclusions:

    • Certain gender differences in cardiovascular disease outcomes are not medically justifiable and require re-evaluation.
    • Addressing these disparities is crucial for equitable healthcare and effective cost containment.
    • The findings support the need for evidence-based, gender-sensitive approaches in cardiovascular medicine.