Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Apparent motion confounds early vernier visual evoked potentials

R S Noss1, R Srebro

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-8592, USA.

Brain Research
|July 15, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of motor-evoked potentials to monitor sciatic nerve status during revision total hip arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2003
Same author

Facial nerve monitoring in middle ear and mastoid surgery.

The Laryngoscope·2001
Same author

Subspace averaging of steady-state visual evoked potentials.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2000
Same author

Very late pain-related activity identified with topographically mapped frequency domain analysis of evoked potentials.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·1998
Same author

Optimal detection of visual evoked potentials.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1998
Same author

Estimating cortical activity from VEPS with the shrinking ellipsoid inverse.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·1997

New research on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) reveals that motion confounds in stimuli can alter results. Direction-specific VEPs occur without motion, while magnitude-specific VEPs require apparent motion.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Human scalp potentials, or visual evoked potentials (VEPs), have been recorded in response to vernier stimuli.
  • Previous studies linked these VEPs to the magnitude of vernier offset but were confounded by apparent motion within the stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate VEPs elicited by vernier stimuli without apparent motion.
  • To differentiate cortical activity related to vernier offset direction versus magnitude.

Main Methods:

  • Multichannel recordings of human scalp potentials.
  • Multivariate analysis methods focusing on scalp field sampling.
  • Comparison of VEPs using stimuli with and without apparent motion.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • VEPs dependent on vernier offset direction were observed at ~75 ms latency in the absence of motion.
  • No early cortical activity related to offset magnitude was found without motion.
  • Stimuli with apparent motion elicited VEPs related to offset magnitude at 75 ms and 200 ms, but not direction.

Conclusions:

  • Cortical activity related to vernier offset direction occurs earlier than previously reported and is independent of motion.
  • Apparent motion in stimuli significantly influences VEPs, potentially confounding previous findings on offset magnitude.
  • Distinguishing between motion-dependent and motion-independent VEPs is crucial for understanding visual processing of spatial offsets.