Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do performance indicators make a difference?

V A Kazandjian1, R G Thomson, W R Law

  • 1Maryland Hospital Association, Lutherville 21093-6087, USA.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2016
Same author

Risk communication in the hyperacute setting of stroke thrombolysis: an interview study of clinicians.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2014
Same author

Enhancing medication use safety: benefits of learning from your peers.

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

Trends in healthcare incident reporting and relationship to safety and quality data in acute hospitals: results from the National Reporting and Learning System.

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

QIR and SQUIRE: continuum of reporting guidelines for scholarly reports in healthcare improvement.

Quality & safety in health care·2008
Same author

Patient decision aids in joint replacement surgery: a literature review and an opinion survey of consultant orthopaedic surgeons.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2008
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles

The Maryland Hospital Association Quality Indicator (QI) Project helps hospitals improve care by comparing data. Participating hospitals identified and acted on opportunities to enhance patient outcomes and reduce issues like emergency department wait times and C-section rates.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Hospital Management
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • The Maryland Hospital Association (MHA) Quality Indicator (QI) Project involves over 1,100 hospitals.
  • Data access is restricted to participants for comparative analysis and improvement.
  • Hospitals focus on enhancing information systems, interdepartmental communication, care processes, and care delivery beyond the hospital.
  • Case studies illustrate improvements in emergency department wait times, post-ambulatory surgery admissions, and cesarean section rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how the MHA Quality Indicator (QI) Project facilitates hospital-wide improvements.
  • To showcase successful interventions addressing specific quality indicators.
  • To highlight the impact of data-driven comparisons on healthcare delivery.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of targeted interventions based on QI data analysis.
  • Formation of multidisciplinary teams to address identified issues.
  • Process redesign, including staffing adjustments, extended unit hours, and changes in medical protocols.
  • Physician engagement in promoting specific treatment pathways, such as trial of labor after cesarean.

Main Results:

  • Reduced emergency department waiting times and improved patient access to treatment.
  • Decreased rates of unscheduled admissions following ambulatory surgery.
  • Lowered cesarean section rates through the promotion of trial of labor and alternative interventions.
  • Enhanced indicator performance across participating hospitals.

Conclusions:

  • The QI Project addresses ongoing challenges in data quality versus care quality.
  • Research continues on the correlation between indicator rates and actual care processes.
  • The utility of severity adjustment in quality indicator analysis remains a key consideration.