Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sexing mouse pups

L W Greenham, V Greenham

    Laboratory Animals
    |July 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study evaluates methods for determining the sex of newborn and young albino mice. Researchers found that measuring the distance between the anus and genitals is unreliable for newborns due to overlapping measurements. Instead, observing the presence of abdominal teats in females at eight days old provides a more accurate identification method.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Rapid identification using pyrolysis mass spectrometry and artificial neural networks of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from dogs.

    The Journal of applied bacteriology·1994
    Same author

    Interference with the oxidative response of neutrophils by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

    Thorax·1993
    Same author

    Absence of measles, mumps, and rubella viral genomic sequences from multiple sclerosis brain tissue by polymerase chain reaction.

    Annals of neurology·1992
    Same author

    Release of gentamicin from acrylic bone cement. Elution and diffusion studies.

    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·1988
    Same author

    Detection of DNA transcripts of measles genes in multiple sclerosis brain tissue by transfection.

    Journal of the neurological sciences·1988
    Same author

    Clostridium perfringens in pelleted feed.

    The Veterinary record·1987
    Same journal

    Standardized surgical access to the porcine temporomandibular joint: Anatomical basis for translational research.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    Same journal

    Development of animal use in experiments: a brief historical overview.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    Same journal

    The reduction potential of diet board feeding-survival and clinical chemistry of group-housed Sprague Dawley rats in a 24-month study.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    Same journal

    Advancing the 3Rs? Researchers' perspectives on institutional facilitation in Switzerland - Part 2: executive facilitation.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    Same journal

    Recognition of pain and distress.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    Same journal

    Strengthening animal welfare: monitoring humane endpoints in a rat model of mammary tumorigenesis undergoing a ladder resistance training protocol.

    Laboratory animals·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Developmental biology and sexing mouse pups research within laboratory animal science
    • Reproductive physiology and mammalian development

    Background:

    Determining the biological sex of neonatal rodents remains a persistent challenge for researchers in laboratory animal science. No prior work had resolved the limitations inherent in using physical measurements for very young specimens. It was already known that morphological differences between sexes are often subtle during the first week of life. That uncertainty drove the need for a reliable, non-invasive technique to identify males and females accurately. Prior research has shown that relying on visual inspection alone often leads to significant errors in sex assignment. This gap motivated a closer examination of standard practices used in breeding facilities. Investigators have long sought methods that minimize handling stress while maximizing classification precision. The current landscape of animal research requires standardized protocols to ensure high-quality data collection across various experimental models.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different morphological methods for sexing random-bred albino mice. Researchers sought to address the persistent challenges associated with identifying the sex of newborn specimens. This investigation was motivated by the high error rates observed when using standard physical measurements. The team examined whether anogenital distance provides a reliable basis for classification in early postnatal life. They also explored the utility of observing specific anatomical features that emerge as the animals mature. This work addresses the need for standardized, precise protocols in laboratory animal management. By comparing different diagnostic approaches, the authors clarify which techniques are most effective for different age groups. The primary goal is to provide clear guidance for researchers needing to distinguish between male and female pups accurately.

    Keywords:
    laboratory animal sciencemorphological assessmentMus musculussex determination

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The researchers propose that anogenital distance measurements fail to provide reliable results for newborns because many individuals fall into ambiguous overlap zones. Accurate identification requires discarding these uncertain cases, which limits the utility of this metric for immediate postnatal sexing.

    The authors identify the presence of abdominal or inguinal teats as a distinct morphological marker. This feature becomes visible in female mice by the eighth day of life, allowing for clear differentiation from male counterparts.

    The study indicates that the eight-day developmental milestone is necessary for the visual identification of teats. Before this time, the anatomical structures are not sufficiently developed or visible to permit consistent classification between the sexes.

    The researchers utilized data from random-bred albino mice to evaluate these morphological indicators. This biological model serves as the primary subject for testing the efficacy of both distance-based and visual-based classification strategies.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The review approach involved analyzing morphological data collected from random-bred albino specimens. Investigators examined the physical characteristics of newborn animals to assess the validity of standard sexing techniques. The team evaluated the distance between the anus and the genital papilla across a cohort of subjects. They also monitored the development of external features during the first week of life. This systematic assessment focused on identifying reliable markers that persist across different developmental stages. Researchers scrutinized the frequency of ambiguous cases where physical measurements failed to provide a definitive sex assignment. The study design prioritized comparing quantitative metrics against qualitative visual observations of anatomical structures. This methodology allowed for a comprehensive appraisal of current practices in laboratory animal identification.

    Main Results:

    Key findings from the literature demonstrate that anogenital distance measurements do not provide reliable sexing for newborn mice. The data show that many animals fall into overlap zones, rendering simple distance metrics ineffective without excluding those specific cases. Conversely, the presence of abdominal teats serves as a highly accurate indicator for female mice. This specific morphological feature becomes clearly observable by the eighth day of life. The authors report that this visual method avoids the ambiguity associated with earlier physical measurements. These results indicate that the timing of assessment significantly influences the success rate of sex determination. The study provides evidence that teat display is a more robust marker than distance-based metrics for this species. These findings clarify the limitations and strengths of common morphological sexing strategies in laboratory settings.

    Conclusions:

    The authors suggest that anogenital distance measurements are insufficient for newborn mice without excluding ambiguous cases. Synthesis and implications indicate that researchers must account for overlap zones when using this specific metric. The team proposes that visual identification of inguinal teats offers a superior alternative for older pups. This approach provides a clear morphological marker that distinguishes females from males at eight days of age. The evidence implies that timing is a critical factor in achieving reliable sex determination in this species. Practitioners should adopt the teat-display method to improve the accuracy of their demographic records. The findings highlight the necessity of selecting appropriate developmental windows for morphological assessments. These insights help refine standard operating procedures for managing laboratory mouse colonies effectively.

    The team measured the distance between the anus and the genitals to assess its predictive value. They compared this quantitative approach against the qualitative observation of teat development to determine which method yielded higher precision.

    The authors imply that adopting the teat-display method will enhance the reliability of sex-based data in laboratory studies. They suggest that moving away from distance-based metrics for newborns will reduce classification errors in animal research.